dbroockerd
New member
rikakris said:Total scam, don't be tricked, it's not a real 1990 NNOF:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Frank-Thomas-41 ... 33705f753a
it has a bid
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
rikakris said:Total scam, don't be tricked, it's not a real 1990 NNOF:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Frank-Thomas-41 ... 33705f753a
dbroockerd said:rikakris said:Total scam, don't be tricked, it's not a real 1990 NNOF:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Frank-Thomas-41 ... 33705f753a
it has a bid
dbroockerd said:dbroockerd said:rikakris said:Total scam, don't be tricked, it's not a real 1990 NNOF:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Frank-Thomas-41 ... 33705f753a
it has a bid
I have a statement from him in his words stating its an original 1990 so if someone gets it they can come to me for the evidence that he scammed them. I'll save the message.
rikakris said:dbroockerd said:dbroockerd said:rikakris said:Total scam, don't be tricked, it's not a real 1990 NNOF:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Frank-Thomas-41 ... 33705f753a
it has a bid
I have a statement from him in his words stating its an original 1990 so if someone gets it they can come to me for the evidence that he scammed them. I'll save the message.
Actually the card this seller relisted is not the same card that he had up first. If you had a chance to look at the first picture the seller had up close, you would have seen that the black line border was intact on the entire left side. The card he has up now looks like it might be legit.
I just went back to the original auction to double check and noticed that he changed the original picture (see the revisions for the auction). The picture he revised it with is his current picture. Not sure what he was trying to do with the first picture that was obviously not a 1990 NNOF.
rikakris said:
randyherth said:rikakris said:
I just don't understand...... It has banged up corners.....especially the top left. I thought to myself I would not bid more than $400 because of the corners. Probably would end up being a PSA 7 or less, and I bought a PSA 7.5 at auction about a year and a half ago for $350.
Wish that I had not sold my BGS 8.5 NNOF!
thefatguy said:Another ungraded sold for 800 BIN
randyherth said:Couple of recent pickups. I just don't understand why the gold team logo on the CC card is so dang hard to find. It shouldn't be a rare card......
![]()
randyherth said:Wasn't aware I had the 1995 leaf promo until Ross informed me as to what I need to look for. I can only imagine that there are many others just hiding out there. For those unaware like I was, it is the card on the left with the smaller gold leaf logo and the trademark further away from the gold logo.
![]()
ASTROBURN said:randyherth said:Wasn't aware I had the 1995 leaf promo until Ross informed me as to what I need to look for. I can only imagine that there are many others just hiding out there. For those unaware like I was, it is the card on the left with the smaller gold leaf logo and the trademark further away from the gold logo.
![]()
I saw this posted in the promo thread. Made me wanna dig out my extra Bagwells. Sure enough, out of the 9 extra Bagwells I have, one of them had the trademark further away than the rest. I love finding new cards I didnt know about already sitting in my doubles box.
randyherth said:Wasn't aware I had the 1995 leaf promo until Ross informed me as to what I need to look for. I can only imagine that there are many others just hiding out there. For those unaware like I was, it is the card on the left with the smaller gold leaf logo and the trademark further away from the gold logo.
![]()
What do the backs look like? Are they the same?randyherth said:Wasn't aware I had the 1995 leaf promo until Ross informed me as to what I need to look for. I can only imagine that there are many others just hiding out there. For those unaware like I was, it is the card on the left with the smaller gold leaf logo and the trademark further away from the gold logo.
![]()