FS: 1990 Pro Set Fred Marion "Belt" Error PSA 9 pop2 - No 10

[jacksoncoupage]

Asking $150.

Nearly impossible to locate in this condition, one of only 2 PSA 9 copies out there, no 10s (a single BGS 9.5 exists).

One of the rarest Pro Set error cards produced, shows a crudely-drawn ***** extending from John Taylor's waist, noted in guides as a "belt":

 

[henderson939]

:shock: That ***** is at least a 9.5. :lol:

 

[jacksoncoupage]

:shock: That ***** is at least a 9.5. :lol:

Yeah, I should've sent it to BGS.

 

[jgro85]

"This card is rather controversial because the card features San Francisco 49ers player John Taylor in the background and the belt from Taylor's pants came undone. The positioning of the belt gives the appearance that his private area is exposed but it is just a shadow and the belt."

 

[jacksoncoupage]

"This card is rather controversial because the card features San Francisco 49ers player John Taylor in the background and the belt from Taylor's pants came undone. The positioning of the belt gives the appearance that his private area is exposed but it is just a shadow and the belt."

No. Either someone with NFL properties (photo dept) or Pro Set added the "private area" to the negative. It is definitely NOT a "belt." Nor is it an image of real "privates."

 

[henderson939]

I was thinking that it is in fact a belt also, and not a "crudely drawn *****" as descibed. The belt appears to taper in the area where the holes are, and the "tip" of it is in the sunlight. I dont think its a babys arm holding an apple, but without it "in hand", I cant really tell. Either way, an interesting error.

 

[IndyManning18]

There goes John Taylor dicking around again and getting the ball intercepted from him.

 

[mstng99tim]

"This card is rather controversial because the card features San Francisco 49ers player John Taylor in the background and the belt from Taylor's pants came undone. The positioning of the belt gives the appearance that his private area is exposed but it is just a shadow and the belt."

No. Either someone with NFL properties (photo dept) or Pro Set added the "private area" to the negative. It is definitely NOT a "belt." Nor is it an image of real "privates."

No, you are wrong. It is a belt, it's been talked about for years.

 

[jacksoncoupage]

"This card is rather controversial because the card features San Francisco 49ers player John Taylor in the background and the belt from Taylor's pants came undone. The positioning of the belt gives the appearance that his private area is exposed but it is just a shadow and the belt."

No. Either someone with NFL properties (photo dept) or Pro Set added the "private area" to the negative. It is definitely NOT a "belt." Nor is it an image of real "privates."

No, you are wrong. It is a belt, it's been talked about for years.

Sorry. I have been working with this set for 21 years now. Consistently. I'm going to trust the years of experience and accumulated info regarding this card as well as the thousands of other Pro Set errors and variations, over your opinion.

 

[hanstess]

Anyone know how many were produced? Gonna go look through my boxes for one...lol

 

[mstng99tim]

"This card is rather controversial because the card features San Francisco 49ers player John Taylor in the background and the belt from Taylor's pants came undone. The positioning of the belt gives the appearance that his private area is exposed but it is just a shadow and the belt."

No. Either someone with NFL properties (photo dept) or Pro Set added the "private area" to the negative. It is definitely NOT a "belt." Nor is it an image of real "privates."

No, you are wrong. It is a belt, it's been talked about for years.

Sorry. I have been working with this set for 21 years now. Consistently. I'm going to trust the years of experience and accumulated info regarding this card as well as the thousands of other Pro Set errors and variations, over your opinion.

Ok. :lol: