Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Grading Question about Refractor Line.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

zbdub808

Active member
Nov 12, 2010
1,487
0
All The Hype said:
Again, it was far tougher to see lines on those cards in person. They appeared much more silver and only appear black in scans. Not sure how that works, but I made almost $40 on that card somehow so I can't complain :P

That is always nice
 

MOFNY

Active member
Aug 9, 2008
4,790
5
East Greenwich, RI
olerud363 said:
I too thought that the highest final grade you could get is 0.5 higher than the lowest subgrade.
Maybe some subgrades are weighed differently? I guess I'm lucky this one got a 9 and not an 8.5.
2000UDExclusivesGoldBGS.jpg
Some are weighted differently. If centering was 8 and surface was 10 then it would go down to an 8.5.

I submit my card:
garza.jpg
 

Keyser Soze

New member
Nov 9, 2010
3,262
0
The Woodlands, TX
The BGS rule, as I have always heard it, is that a card can grade no higher than a full point above the lowest subgrade. Some people are incorrectly stating that a grade can only be .5 higher than the lowest subgrade, and that is not true, and many cards shown on the thread have indicated.

As George's Wong showed (hahahaha), it is completely plausible to get an 8.5 subgrade and be elevated by the other subgrades to a 9.5 overall, but there are very few cards that can get a 10 on the other 3 subgrades like George's was abble to do. George's Wong (hahahaha) just happens to be a Leaf Valiant, which is one of the few brands than can, with any regularity, get 10's on multiple subgrades
 

ThoseBackPages

New member
Aug 7, 2008
32,986
8
New York
Keyser Soze said:
The BGS rule, as I have always heard it, is that a card can grade no higher than a full point above the lowest subgrade. Some people are incorrectly stating that a grade can only be .5 higher than the lowest subgrade, and that is not true, and many cards shown on the thread have indicated.

As George's Wong showed (hahahaha), it is completely plausible to get an 8.5 subgrade and be elevated by the other subgrades to a 9.5 overall, but there are very few cards that can get a 10 on the other 3 subgrades like George's was abble to do. George's Wong (hahahaha) just happens to be a Leaf Valiant, which is one of the few brands than can, with any regularity, get 10's on multiple subgrades

1989 UD Griffey is another one in this category due to scratching on the hologram
 

Keyser Soze

New member
Nov 9, 2010
3,262
0
The Woodlands, TX
As an aside, I personally do not think a card should be able to grade a gem mint overall if it has an 8.5 as a subgrade. A card labeled as Gem Mint should not have a subgrade that doesn't even qualify as Mint. But that's a different debate for a different thread
 

olerud363

Active member
Jun 14, 2010
3,213
16
Ontario, Canada
Keyser Soze said:
As an aside, I personally do not think a card should be able to grade a gem mint overall if it has an 8.5 as a subgrade. A card labeled as Gem Mint should not have a subgrade that doesn't even qualify as Mint. But that's a different debate for a different thread

I agree.

I checked the BGS grading info (http://www.beckett.com/estore/helpsys/v ... icleId=301), and here are a few quotes that might apply to some of the discussion that has taken place here:
- "the lowest grade is the most heavily weighted in determining the overall grade"
- "the minimum requirement to receive a grade of Gem Mint is to have at least three grades of 9.5 and the fourth to be no less than a 9"
- "the final grade rarely, if ever, exceeds two levels above the lowest of the four characteristic grades. For example, if a card has characteristic grades of Centering 10, Corners 6, Edges 10 and Surface 10, the final grade will be a "7" (of which is exactly two grading levels above the lowest characteristic grade)."
 

Fandruw25

Active member
Aug 25, 2008
3,238
0
olerud363 said:
Keyser Soze said:
As an aside, I personally do not think a card should be able to grade a gem mint overall if it has an 8.5 as a subgrade. A card labeled as Gem Mint should not have a subgrade that doesn't even qualify as Mint. But that's a different debate for a different thread

I agree.

I checked the BGS grading info (http://www.beckett.com/estore/helpsys/v ... icleId=301), and here are a few quotes that might apply to some of the discussion that has taken place here:
- "the lowest grade is the most heavily weighted in determining the overall grade"
- "the minimum requirement to receive a grade of Gem Mint is to have at least three grades of 9.5 and the fourth to be no less than a 9"
- "the final grade rarely, if ever, exceeds two levels above the lowest of the four characteristic grades. For example, if a card has characteristic grades of Centering 10, Corners 6, Edges 10 and Surface 10, the final grade will be a "7" (of which is exactly two grading levels above the lowest characteristic grade)."

This rule hurts

1995BowmansBestRefractors-1.jpg
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Top