Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

I clearly need a new scanner.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

luker2324

New member
Jan 7, 2009
106
0
I am in the same boat. i have stopped scanning because I know I will just need to re-scan them once i do get a new one.
 

Sean_C

New member
Oct 21, 2009
1,561
0
Some people swear by Cannon, others swear by Epson, others like me swear by HP. You might be able to find a deal on a good scanner now due to the release of Windows 7 (not sure if older ones will be compatible, the way that many XP ones weren't when Vista was rolled out).

Whatever you do, make sure you get one that is CCD rather than CIS. I'm guessing that your current scanner has a CIS sensor rather than CCD, as they tend to be brutal on slabs. Here is a good link that explains the difference.http://www.scantips.com/chap3c.html
 

cgilmo

Well-known member
Administrator
Aug 6, 2008
37,212
35
Alpharetta, Georgia, United States
Sean_C said:
Some people swear by Cannon, others swear by Epson, others like me swear by HP. You might be able to find a deal on a good scanner now due to the release of Windows 7 (not sure if older ones will be compatible, the way that many XP ones weren't when Vista was rolled out).

Whatever you do, make sure you get one that is CCD rather than CIS. I'm guessing that your current scanner has a CIS sensor rather than CCD, as they tend to be brutal on slabs. Here is a good link that explains the difference.http://www.scantips.com/chap3c.html


yeah, im aware of the difference

I have the one i have now because of its form factor and low power requirements


also, I am using windows 7 so...
 

jeff550

New member
May 5, 2009
9,896
0
burke
to save money you could go with the white paper route :lol:
but whateve you do dont get an hp photosmart c4180. if you have seen my scans you know what im talking about
 

Sean_C

New member
Oct 21, 2009
1,561
0
It's likely due to the raised edge of the holder. It prevents the front of the slab from resting against the glass. The sleeve inside the holder doesn't help either. PSA slabs have less of an edge on them.

MOFNY said:
I think PSA slabs tend to scan a little bit better.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top