I have a new favorite photobucket image

[cgilmo]

 

[WaxHeaven]

Congrats!

 

[G $MONEY$]

what is it?

Those Razor/FCB National promos?

 

[cgilmo]

what is it?

Those Razor/FCB National promos?

yep!

 

[Philip J. Fry]

Very nice!

 

[metallicalex777]

Those definitely look great. My favorite is how well the FCB logo not only looks great but makes it look as though FCB should be on more cards than just 1. Awesome job Chris!!!

Alex

 

[uniquebaseballcards]

Was the reason why no (MLB) established players were selected for the set because of royalty issues? For what its worth, the set makes it seem like FCB is for prospectors only.

 

[cgilmo]

Was the reason why no (MLB) established players were selected for the set because of royalty issues? For what its worth, the set makes it seem like FCB is for prospectors only.

well man


I think its kinda obvious where we got the licencing for this set. We could only use guys they had under contract. And even then there were more restrictions.


You can't just print a card of whomever you want to for stuff like this.

 

[masonphillip]

Was the reason why no (MLB) established players were selected for the set because of royalty issues? For what its worth, the set makes it seem like FCB is for prospectors only.

well man


I think its kinda obvious where we got the licencing for this set. We could only use guys they had under contract. And even then there were more restrictions.


You can't just print a card of whomever you want to for stuff like this.

~dissapointing, and here I thought you were putting ruth cut autos in this set~

 

[cgilmo]

Was the reason why no (MLB) established players were selected for the set because of royalty issues? For what its worth, the set makes it seem like FCB is for prospectors only.

well man


I think its kinda obvious where we got the licencing for this set. We could only use guys they had under contract. And even then there were more restrictions.


You can't just print a card of whomever you want to for stuff like this.

~dissapointing, and here I thought you were putting ruth cut autos in this set~

I negotiated with CMG, but they shot me down.

 

[uniquebaseballcards]

Yeah no kidding. Seems like it was because of royalty issues as I said initially. But its seemingly only obvious to some folks here.

Was the reason why no (MLB) established players were selected for the set because of royalty issues? For what its worth, the set makes it seem like FCB is for prospectors only.

well man


I think its kinda obvious where we got the licencing for this set. We could only use guys they had under contract. And even then there were more restrictions.


You can't just print a card of whomever you want to for stuff like this.

 

[Card Magnet]

Great, Gilmore's counterfeiting FCB promos out of his basement... :lol:



Cool stuff, they look great. I don't care if they're prospects or not, I think it's good publicity.

 

[cgilmo]

Great, Gilmore's counterfeiting FCB promos out of his basement...



Cool stuff, they look great. I don't care if they're prospects or not, I think it's good publicity.

these were printed by the same company that does a lot of UD's stuff

 

[ru4scuba]

Was the reason why no (MLB) established players were selected for the set because of royalty issues? For what its worth, the set makes it seem like FCB is for prospectors only.

well man

I think its kinda obvious where we got the licencing for this set. We could only use guys they had under contract. And even then there were more restrictions.

You can't just print a card of whomever you want to for stuff like this.

~Donruss/Panini can't get an MLB license to print cards, but I bet FCB could!~

I think you should go after Boras next year. How kick ass would it be that the first Scott Boras card is released in an FCB promo set?!

 

[cgilmo]

Was the reason why no (MLB) established players were selected for the set because of royalty issues? For what its worth, the set makes it seem like FCB is for prospectors only.

well man

I think its kinda obvious where we got the licencing for this set. We could only use guys they had under contract. And even then there were more restrictions.

You can't just print a card of whomever you want to for stuff like this.

~Donruss/Panini can't get an MLB license to print cards, but I bet FCB could!~

I think you should go after Boras next year. How kick ass would it be that the first Scott Boras card is released in an FCB promo set?!

I plan on contacting a few MLB players next year.

 

[ru4scuba]

I plan on contacting a few MLB players next year.

Good luck with that.

 

[cgilmo]

I plan on contacting a few MLB players next year.

Good luck with that.

yes, I am going to need it

 

[masonphillip]

I'd like to see some inserts

1:10 sets you get a mod card, some ideas as follows.

1. A gilmo rookie card
2. An Allincards break used beard card, contains a DNA hair from Andrew's beard.
3. An NECPilgrims8 fight used MMA card
4. A phillies mod card with pictures of Phillyfan, BowmanChromeAddict and other Phillies fans on the board all kissing the WS ring.

 

[masonphillip]

I plan on contacting a few MLB players next year.

Good luck with that.

They won't be able to resist the 'Bama charm.

 

[uniquebaseballcards]

I'd like a teapot refractor card.