Jason Heyward 2010 Superfractor Autograph

[Jaypers]

[ebay:1jshv1va]290441259456[/ebay:1jshv1va]

 

[ChasHawk]

Did Heyward get a bad batch of pens?

 

[brouthercard]

So which one would everyone rather have, his 2007 super, 2008 auto super, or 2010 auto super?

 

[All The Hype]

So which one would everyone rather have, his 2007 super, 2008 auto super, or 2010 auto super?

2008 for me



This is the only version of this card that I don't think is notably ugly. Not sure what it is..maybe the color combo of black and green and then blue ink plus a dark jersey but I just don't like the look of his 2010 autos at all.

What will this one sell for?

 

[mudflap02]

So which one would everyone rather have, his 2007 super, 2008 auto super, or 2010 auto super?

Why would anyone choose the 2010 auto super over the 2008 auto super? Does that imply that anyone is buying into the MLB RC rules? I'm not trying to be a quit swearing, I honestly don't understand why you would take the 2010.

Also, his autos in the 2010 chrome set don't look as nice. He signed them about twice as big - they look like autos you would get IP. That's one of the things I like about certified autos as opposed to IP autos - they are signed in a controlled environment, on a table (usually), and they are generally a lot more aesthetically pleasing.

 

[Halonut]

i would prefer the 08 auto but the 2010's have a nice bold sig. earlier issues looked a little funky due to j-hey's tendency to sign to the left side of the card.

 

[uniquebaseballcards]

I'd want the 2010 version, I happen to prefer his first card as a major league player over previous versions.

With that said I'd prefer the Topps Chrome version, I don't see the need for two chrome products of MLB guys.

So which one would everyone rather have, his 2007 super, 2008 auto super, or 2010 auto super?

Why would anyone choose the 2010 auto super over the 2008 auto super? Does that imply that anyone is buying into the MLB RC rules? I'm not trying to be a quit swearing, I honestly don't understand why you would take the 2010.

Also, his autos in the 2010 chrome set don't look as nice. He signed them about twice as big - they look like autos you would get IP. That's one of the things I like about certified autos as opposed to IP autos - they are signed in a controlled environment, on a table (usually), and they are generally a lot more aesthetically pleasing.

 

[MOFNY]

Great looking card.

 

[Sean_C]

2007 Super.

 

[miguelcabrera]

probably would rather have the 2010 one but because it is so ugly (idk why i just think the 2010 heywards are ugly for some reason) probably would most rather have the 2008 since its closer to his actual MLB debut true rc

 

[matchpenalty]

I like how most of his 2010 chrome autos look. Very bold, while the super auto isn't terrible. Too bad the J and end of auto came out light.

 

[ideal0024]

2007 Super.

Agreed.

 

[lisu]

I want one of his 2010 Bowman Chrome auto's because I like the way his auto looks on it! That said - I'd prefer the 2008 Super.

 

[shepsspot]

I contacted the seller because he lives right near me.

He wanted $7,500 cash and he would hand deliver it to me.

Shep

 

[brouthercard]

I would want the 2007 as well.

 

[Bob Loblaw]

I contacted the seller because he lives right near me.

He wanted $7,500 cash and he would hand deliver it to me.

Shep

Good freakin' luck....

 

[Sean_C]

To me, first is first. Sure the autographed 2008 is nice, but if I wanted an autographed 2007, I'd try to get one of them signed in person and not worry about it.

Then again, I prefer the 51 Bowman Mantle to the 52 Topps.

 

[shepsspot]

I contacted the seller because he lives right near me.

He wanted $7,500 cash and he would hand deliver it to me.

Shep

Good freakin' luck....

Yeah I emailed him back and told him thats the same price the 08 went for and I would be passing on it.

Shep