Listing Advice - selling a huge refractor lot

[pujolsjunkie]

Hey guys, I'm going to be putting my Jarrod Parker refractors on ebay as a lot - 123 raws, 3 BGS 9.5s and a BGS 9. What would be the best picture to put as the main photo for the auction? A scan of a refractor? A scan of one of the gem ones? A photo of the entire lot? It's a pretty major sale so I want to get it right. All input is welcome.

 

[thefasterblade]

Show the pics that you might choose from.

 

[A_Pharis]

Scan a raw for the raws. Scan a 9.5 for the 9.5's and the 9.0 individually.

For the raws, I would list the Serial number for each one in it's respective auction, and I would be sure to put in BIG BOLD PRINT that the image used for the auction is one of the lot. I would also note if the card has any signifigant difference from the scan (such as severely off-centered), but make no note of it being in "Mint" or any other condition.
For the 9.5's, I'd list the BGS serial in each respective auction along with the subgrades for each one.

Good luck.

 

[pujolsjunkie]

Scan a raw for the raws. Scan a 9.5 for the 9.5's and the 9.0 individually.

For the raws, I would list the Serial number for each one in it's respective auction, and I would be sure to put in BIG BOLD PRINT that the image used for the auction is one of the lot. I would also note if the card has any signifigant difference from the scan (such as severely off-centered), but make no note of it being in "Mint" or any other condition.
For the 9.5's, I'd list the BGS serial in each respective auction along with the subgrades for each one.

Good luck.

Oh no, I think you misunderstood. I'm selling this in one big auction. 2007 refractors aren't serial numbered either.

 

[yanxyanx]

Hey,

I would say best way to maximize value on this is as follows:

Make the gallery picture a picture of all of the cards. Spread them out so they fit on one picture so that you can see how many cards it is (similar to how you have your Brandon Morrow lot listed). Also, I would add a subtitle to say that they are ALL refractors, as people might think its 20 refractors and the rest base or something like that.

For inside the auction, the more pictures the better. Maybe take scans of 20 refractors at a time, and do 6 scans of the raw, then scan the graded separately.

People will probably be interested in knowing if the 123 are gradeable, so the more detail the better.

Good luck!

 

[A_Pharis]

Scan a raw for the raws. Scan a 9.5 for the 9.5's and the 9.0 individually.

For the raws, I would list the Serial number for each one in it's respective auction, and I would be sure to put in BIG BOLD PRINT that the image used for the auction is one of the lot. I would also note if the card has any signifigant difference from the scan (such as severely off-centered), but make no note of it being in "Mint" or any other condition.
For the 9.5's, I'd list the BGS serial in each respective auction along with the subgrades for each one.

Good luck.

Oohhhhh. Well my bad on both parts.

Oh no, I think you misunderstood. I'm selling this in one big auction. 2007 refractors aren't serial numbered either.