My 2008 BDP Auto Rankings

[aw00d05]

[quote="ALL_THE_HYPE":184uk5lb]

[quote="ALL_THE_HYPE":184uk5lb]

I agree with the list for the most part. I would think that Holland and Reddick are a head of Collier though. Holland and Reddick are both much more advanced, and Collier is extremely raw. I like all three of them though.

I agree right now, but this list takes the future into account and what I think these guys will be like down the road. I think Collier is going to be an absolute beast by the time he makes it to the majors (and therefore, be better overall than Reddick and Holland).

Are you ranking this on skill or card value? Reddick has Boston behind him and that boosts him over a lot of people who would be more skilled than him.

Yeah I thought about doing something like this, but this list was more my evaluation of the players' skill/potential/tool package/etc. As you know, card value generally follows those things, at least to an extent, but I definitely agree about Reddick's value with Boston and would probably move him to 6th on this list if this was based on my prediction of future value.

Here is a quick prediction of future value. The top four are still the top four, but Montero takes sole possession of the #1 spot, and Flores overtakes Posey as a Met.

Inoa and Holland drop a couple spots, Reddick moves up.

I still like Collier at 5 based on what I think he could be capable of down the road-I think he will be good enough that Reddick as an everyday player for Boston (kinda reminds me of JD Drew) will still be valued below Collier as a stud for Philly.

It's still too early for me to tell if Davis will be able to surpass Holland even as a Met.

Gutierrez drops out and Hewitt moves into spot number ten.

I just put this together in about two minutes, so I'd call this a preliminary list, to say the least.

1. Montero
2. Beckham
3. Flores
4. Posey
5. Collier
6. Reddick
7. Inoa
8. Holland
9. Davis
10. Hewitt

You forgot stanton.

So I did. I'd put him at #3 or #4 and move everyone else down a slot.[/quote:184uk5lb]
But, since he's on the Marlins, wouldn't he be fifth? That's where I would put him, as correct me if I'm wrong this is a combination of skill, potential, and team.
This would be my list (pretty much the same):
1. Montero
2. Beckham
3. Flores
4. Posey
5. Reddick
6. Holland
7. Ynoa
8. Collier
9. Davis
10. Hewitt

JG[/quote:184uk5lb]
haha you forgot stanton too...

 

[All The Hype]

[quote="ALL_THE_HYPE":1i0q9rbv]

[quote="ALL_THE_HYPE":1i0q9rbv][quote="pjnprospects":1i0q9rbv]I agree with the list for the most part. I would think that Holland and Reddick are a head of Collier though. Holland and Reddick are both much more advanced, and Collier is extremely raw. I like all three of them though.

I agree right now, but this list takes the future into account and what I think these guys will be like down the road. I think Collier is going to be an absolute beast by the time he makes it to the majors (and therefore, be better overall than Reddick and Holland).

Are you ranking this on skill or card value? Reddick has Boston behind him and that boosts him over a lot of people who would be more skilled than him.

Yeah I thought about doing something like this, but this list was more my evaluation of the players' skill/potential/tool package/etc. As you know, card value generally follows those things, at least to an extent, but I definitely agree about Reddick's value with Boston and would probably move him to 6th on this list if this was based on my prediction of future value.

Here is a quick prediction of future value. The top four are still the top four, but Montero takes sole possession of the #1 spot, and Flores overtakes Posey as a Met.

Inoa and Holland drop a couple spots, Reddick moves up.

I still like Collier at 5 based on what I think he could be capable of down the road-I think he will be good enough that Reddick as an everyday player for Boston (kinda reminds me of JD Drew) will still be valued below Collier as a stud for Philly.

It's still too early for me to tell if Davis will be able to surpass Holland even as a Met.

Gutierrez drops out and Hewitt moves into spot number ten.

I just put this together in about two minutes, so I'd call this a preliminary list, to say the least.

1. Montero
2. Beckham
3. Flores
4. Posey
5. Collier
6. Reddick
7. Inoa
8. Holland
9. Davis
10. Hewitt

You forgot stanton.

So I did. I'd put him at #3 or #4 and move everyone else down a slot.[/quote:1i0q9rbv]
But, since he's on the Marlins, wouldn't he be fifth? That's where I would put him, as correct me if I'm wrong this is a combination of skill, potential, and team.
This would be my list (pretty much the same):
1. Montero
2. Beckham
3. Flores
4. Posey
5. Reddick
6. Holland
7. Ynoa
8. Collier
9. Davis
10. Hewitt

JG[/quote:1i0q9rbv]
haha you forgot stanton too...[/quote:1i0q9rbv]


:lol:

I still have Stanton at #3 just because of his skill. Look at Hanley Ramirez chrome autos for example. Obviously Stanton has far more cards than Hanley did, but still he is one of the best players in the game and plays for a small market team and his chrome autos still sell for hundreds of dollars. There comes a certain point where it no longer matters what team you play for. If you're good, you're good, and people will buy your cards. I believe that Stanton will be passed that point in the future.

 

[aw00d05]

[quote="ALL_THE_HYPE":1hsourn0]

[quote="ALL_THE_HYPE":1hsourn0]

[quote="ALL_THE_HYPE":1hsourn0][quote="pjnprospects":1hsourn0]I agree with the list for the most part. I would think that Holland and Reddick are a head of Collier though. Holland and Reddick are both much more advanced, and Collier is extremely raw. I like all three of them though.

I agree right now, but this list takes the future into account and what I think these guys will be like down the road. I think Collier is going to be an absolute beast by the time he makes it to the majors (and therefore, be better overall than Reddick and Holland).

Are you ranking this on skill or card value? Reddick has Boston behind him and that boosts him over a lot of people who would be more skilled than him.

Yeah I thought about doing something like this, but this list was more my evaluation of the players' skill/potential/tool package/etc. As you know, card value generally follows those things, at least to an extent, but I definitely agree about Reddick's value with Boston and would probably move him to 6th on this list if this was based on my prediction of future value.

Here is a quick prediction of future value. The top four are still the top four, but Montero takes sole possession of the #1 spot, and Flores overtakes Posey as a Met.

Inoa and Holland drop a couple spots, Reddick moves up.

I still like Collier at 5 based on what I think he could be capable of down the road-I think he will be good enough that Reddick as an everyday player for Boston (kinda reminds me of JD Drew) will still be valued below Collier as a stud for Philly.

It's still too early for me to tell if Davis will be able to surpass Holland even as a Met.

Gutierrez drops out and Hewitt moves into spot number ten.

I just put this together in about two minutes, so I'd call this a preliminary list, to say the least.

1. Montero
2. Beckham
3. Flores
4. Posey
5. Collier
6. Reddick
7. Inoa
8. Holland
9. Davis
10. Hewitt

You forgot stanton.

So I did. I'd put him at #3 or #4 and move everyone else down a slot.[/quote:1hsourn0]
But, since he's on the Marlins, wouldn't he be fifth? That's where I would put him, as correct me if I'm wrong this is a combination of skill, potential, and team.
This would be my list (pretty much the same):
1. Montero
2. Beckham
3. Flores
4. Posey
5. Reddick
6. Holland
7. Ynoa
8. Collier
9. Davis
10. Hewitt

JG[/quote:1hsourn0]
haha you forgot stanton too...[/quote:1hsourn0]


:lol:

I still have Stanton at #3 just because of his skill. Look at Hanley Ramirez chrome autos for example. Obviously Stanton has far more cards than Hanley did, but still he is one of the best players in the game and plays for a small market team and his chrome autos still sell for hundreds of dollars. There comes a certain point where it no longer matters what team you play for. If you're good, you're good, and people will buy your cards. I believe that Stanton will be passed that point in the future.[/quote:1hsourn0]
Hanley is underpriced big time IMO, wish i would've had the money when one of his chromes autos came up with wrong name and could've gotten for like $95...

 

[trademhigh]

Lol! I did forget stanton. It was because I pretty much copied your list and shifted guys around:
1. Montero
2. Beckham
3. Flores
4. Stanton
5. Posey
6. Holland
7. Reddick
8. Ynoa
9. Collier
10. Davis

There we go.

 

[GTJ558]

[quote="ALL_THE_HYPE":1bfswtbm]

I agree with the list for the most part. I would think that Holland and Reddick are a head of Collier though. Holland and Reddick are both much more advanced, and Collier is extremely raw. I like all three of them though.

I agree right now, but this list takes the future into account and what I think these guys will be like down the road. I think Collier is going to be an absolute beast by the time he makes it to the majors (and therefore, be better overall than Reddick and Holland).

Are you ranking this on skill or card value? Reddick has Boston behind him and that boosts him over a lot of people who would be more skilled than him.

Yeah I thought about doing something like this, but this list was more my evaluation of the players' skill/potential/tool package/etc. As you know, card value generally follows those things, at least to an extent, but I definitely agree about Reddick's value with Boston and would probably move him to 6th on this list if this was based on my prediction of future value.

Here is a quick prediction of future value. The top four are still the top four, but Montero takes sole possession of the #1 spot, and Flores overtakes Posey as a Met.

Inoa and Holland drop a couple spots, Reddick moves up.

I still like Collier at 5 based on what I think he could be capable of down the road-I think he will be good enough that Reddick as an everyday player for Boston (kinda reminds me of JD Drew) will still be valued below Collier as a stud for Philly.

It's still too early for me to tell if Davis will be able to surpass Holland even as a Met.

Gutierrez drops out and Hewitt moves into spot number ten.

I just put this together in about two minutes, so I'd call this a preliminary list, to say the least.

1. Montero
2. Beckham
3. Flores
4. Posey
5. Collier
6. Reddick
7. Inoa
8. Holland
9. Davis
10. Hewitt[/quote:1bfswtbm]

if Davis hits this season, he might be moving up from 9, did you notice Daniel Murphy last season?

 

[All The Hype]

[quote="ALL_THE_HYPE":3l0u04hz]

I agree with the list for the most part. I would think that Holland and Reddick are a head of Collier though. Holland and Reddick are both much more advanced, and Collier is extremely raw. I like all three of them though.

I agree right now, but this list takes the future into account and what I think these guys will be like down the road. I think Collier is going to be an absolute beast by the time he makes it to the majors (and therefore, be better overall than Reddick and Holland).

Are you ranking this on skill or card value? Reddick has Boston behind him and that boosts him over a lot of people who would be more skilled than him.

Yeah I thought about doing something like this, but this list was more my evaluation of the players' skill/potential/tool package/etc. As you know, card value generally follows those things, at least to an extent, but I definitely agree about Reddick's value with Boston and would probably move him to 6th on this list if this was based on my prediction of future value.

Here is a quick prediction of future value. The top four are still the top four, but Montero takes sole possession of the #1 spot, and Flores overtakes Posey as a Met.

Inoa and Holland drop a couple spots, Reddick moves up.

I still like Collier at 5 based on what I think he could be capable of down the road-I think he will be good enough that Reddick as an everyday player for Boston (kinda reminds me of JD Drew) will still be valued below Collier as a stud for Philly.

It's still too early for me to tell if Davis will be able to surpass Holland even as a Met.

Gutierrez drops out and Hewitt moves into spot number ten.

I just put this together in about two minutes, so I'd call this a preliminary list, to say the least.

1. Montero
2. Beckham
3. Flores
4. Posey
5. Collier
6. Reddick
7. Inoa
8. Holland
9. Davis
10. Hewitt

if Davis hits this season, he might be moving up from 9, did you notice Daniel Murphy last season?[/quote:3l0u04hz]


Agreed, but he still hasn't shown the power that he supposedly has so I ended up ranking him kinda in the middle since him being successful basically depends on this (as a first baseman)