- Thread starter
- #1
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
ProspectHussler said:In the flesh. Thanks for reading big keeenan.
You should have went to my high school when we had random drug testing. The football team would randomly miss taking it every time. In some places, sports are just worth more. I don't agree with it, but I learned to accept it, roll with it, and use it to my benefit.ProspectHussler said:KandK - Cool man. Respect your opinion. Care to elaborate? I obviously realize that these individuals bring in revenue to their schools, I still think you shouldn't be given a pass to cheat on your SAT just because you are a talented athlete. UG had the guts to say no to Dozier after realizing that his C - average in no way correlated to his 1200+ SAT score.
You are spot in with SATs, and I think SAT standards are way too low as it is. I meant more in terms of what a "student athlete" really is. Sure, it varies from school to school, but they deserve a LOT more credit than you give them.ProspectHussler said:KandK - Cool man. Respect your opinion. Care to elaborate? I obviously realize that these individuals bring in revenue to their schools, I still think you shouldn't be given a pass to cheat on your SAT just because you are a talented athlete. UG had the guts to say no to Dozier after realizing that his C - average in no way correlated to his 1200+ SAT score.
KandKCards said:You are spot in with SATs, and I think SAT standards are way too low as it is. I meant more in terms of what a "student athlete" really is. Sure, it varies from school to school, but they deserve a LOT more credit than you give them.ProspectHussler said:KandK - Cool man. Respect your opinion. Care to elaborate? I obviously realize that these individuals bring in revenue to their schools, I still think you shouldn't be given a pass to cheat on your SAT just because you are a talented athlete. UG had the guts to say no to Dozier after realizing that his C - average in no way correlated to his 1200+ SAT score.
To an extent, yes, but it's not nearly as much as you think.ProspectorsAdvantage said:KandKCards said:You are spot in with SATs, and I think SAT standards are way too low as it is. I meant more in terms of what a "student athlete" really is. Sure, it varies from school to school, but they deserve a LOT more credit than you give them.ProspectHussler said:KandK - Cool man. Respect your opinion. Care to elaborate? I obviously realize that these individuals bring in revenue to their schools, I still think you shouldn't be given a pass to cheat on your SAT just because you are a talented athlete. UG had the guts to say no to Dozier after realizing that his C - average in no way correlated to his 1200+ SAT score.
It depends on the school/Sport associated with it. Good luck with the blog and nice read!
KandKCards said:To an extent, yes, but it's not nearly as much as you think.ProspectorsAdvantage said:KandKCards said:You are spot in with SATs, and I think SAT standards are way too low as it is. I meant more in terms of what a "student athlete" really is. Sure, it varies from school to school, but they deserve a LOT more credit than you give them.ProspectHussler said:KandK - Cool man. Respect your opinion. Care to elaborate? I obviously realize that these individuals bring in revenue to their schools, I still think you shouldn't be given a pass to cheat on your SAT just because you are a talented athlete. UG had the guts to say no to Dozier after realizing that his C - average in no way correlated to his 1200+ SAT score.
It depends on the school/Sport associated with it. Good luck with the blog and nice read!
Or the coach. Any coach who claims ignorance is lying through his teeth. There is no D1 coach in the country who doesn't know everything about what's going on in his program.OnOnUofK said:What I don't understand is how the players that do this are not penalized in any way. Memphis might be looking at a hefty penalty, but DRose and Dozier are not really affected. I would like for the NBA to reverse the one year rule. I know it doesn't effect Dozier in any way, but players like D Rose and OJ Mayo are killing programs. Guys who can't keep their grades up should either be able to go pro or swallow their pride and go the JUCO route.
Great read btw. Big fan of the blog
I probably came across wrong. They absolutely get treated differently, but I get tired of hearing this "student athlete doesn't exist" stuff. There are the extremes of guys who aren't students at all and the other end is walk-ons who get straight A's, but those aren't the norm. But could they all be better students? Absolutely.ProspectorsAdvantage said:KandKCards said:To an extent, yes, but it's not nearly as much as you think.ProspectorsAdvantage said:KandKCards said:You are spot in with SATs, and I think SAT standards are way too low as it is. I meant more in terms of what a "student athlete" really is. Sure, it varies from school to school, but they deserve a LOT more credit than you give them.ProspectHussler said:KandK - Cool man. Respect your opinion. Care to elaborate? I obviously realize that these individuals bring in revenue to their schools, I still think you shouldn't be given a pass to cheat on your SAT just because you are a talented athlete. UG had the guts to say no to Dozier after realizing that his C - average in no way correlated to his 1200+ SAT score.
It depends on the school/Sport associated with it. Good luck with the blog and nice read!
At my school it for sure is. I have a friend on a National powerhouse contender and a friend on a team at the same school that is terrible. They get treated way way differently.