Opinion on Authenticity of this card

[Guest]

hi guys, i have had this card for a while.. what do you think.. authentic or not? and if not, why...

 

[Lars]

Are you trying to sell in on eBay?

 

[Guest]

yeah i am actually listing it in my store... but i tell of how i obtained it.. so all is clear..

 

[nyc3]

send it to psa, and why would you want to know whats wrong with it? odd

 

[Guest]

send it to psa, and why would you want to know whats wrong with it? odd

odd, not really.. i listed it in my store with how i got it, and i wanted your all opinions.. i have had it for years.. i got it with a lot of cards i won..

 

[jam92102]

I voted "no". Just by looking at the card compared to other certified auto's of his.

 

[BluesBroSJ]

I voted yes, after comparing it to a few of his earlier examples I have, it looks like a very early auto, between 90-93 is when this would have been signed. His signing style changed after he left atlanta and then some subtle changes to his signature after 2000. The tail end of the D (that looks a lot like a Z) is always touching the J in his early signatures. That being said, there is one thing i do not like about the signature and thats the elongated vertical line at the end of his signature. It's very exaggerated in comparison. I am blaming that on what looks like the fat pen he signed with. If you want pictures / scans of some of his other early autos PM me

 

[autocut]

Looks legit to me.

 

[Philip J. Fry]

I voted "no". Just by looking at the card compared to other certified auto's of his.

Sometimes you can't go by that, as players will alter their sig from an IP/TTM one VS a certified one. I have an IP auto of Tony Clark and it doesn't come close to his sig found on certified auto cards.

Example: