Opinions Please - Should I Sub These? PSA or BGS?

[alexs64]

I have a few cards I am debating on subbing. I would love some opinions on whether or not I should and also to which company to sub them too. Thanks in advance!!!

1982 Topps Ripken Front:

Back:

1982 Fleer Ripken Front:

Back:

1989 UD Griffey Front:

Back:

2010 Topps Chrome Ethier Superfractor:

2010 Bowman Chrome Jansen Red /5 Front:

Back:

2010 Bowman Sterling Zach Lee Gold AU /50 Front:

Back:

 

[JVC]

Re: Opinions Please - Should I Sub There? PSA or BGS?

I would go with PSA for the Ripkens and Griffey and BGS for the rest. 80's cards sell better in PSA slabs and newer chrome stuff sells better in BGS unless a guy grabs the attention of the registry guys which doesn't apply to any of those cards.

 

[alexs64]

Re: Opinions Please - Should I Sub There? PSA or BGS?

I would go with PSA for the Ripkens and Griffey and BGS for the rest. 80's cards sell better in PSA slabs and newer chrome stuff sells better in BGS unless a guy grabs the attention of the registry guys which doesn't apply to any of those cards.

Thanked!!

 

[SydBarrett]

A suggestion, when taking scans/pics, put them against Black Cardboard paper, it makes it easier to define the edges.

 

[alexs64]

A suggestion, when taking scans/pics, put them against Black Cardboard paper, it makes it easier to define the edges.

Great advice, I will make sure in the future I do just that. Thanks! And post thanked.

 

[rehmus]

BGS for anything which wouldnt classify as BVG

so... everything.

 

[jjj7880]

Re: Opinions Please - Should I Sub There? PSA or BGS?

I would go with PSA for the Ripkens and Griffey and BGS for the rest. 80's cards sell better in PSA slabs and newer chrome stuff sells better in BGS unless a guy grabs the attention of the registry guys which doesn't apply to any of those cards.

What Jeff said

 

[George_Calfas]

New stuff here BGS
Jr. PSA
Cal do not sub unless you want grading for protection.

 

[alexs64]

Posts have been thanked! I appreciate the input guys.