lisu
Active member
phillyfan0417 said:
I'm glad someone is brave enough to write what he thinks. Those were some of the same arguments that I had.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
phillyfan0417 said:
Shi Guy said:My concern isn't with Paterno or the football program, as I'm sure Paterno will live in relative comfort from his earnings. My worry is that this incident sets a very dangerous precedent; one where not doing what the public deems as enough is as dangerous as doing the wrong thing. While we'd all like to think that we would do the right thing if we were to find ourselves in a situation such as those detailed in the report, the fact of the matter is, we just don't know how things will go down until we actually find ourselves in such a situation. Any number of various circumstances can come into play, no matter what your training or background may be, that can have a drastic effect on the actions of all involved. The fact that Paterno was not found guilty of not following the CPSL speaks volumes, and tells me he performed some action that satisfied the demands of the law.
It scares me that public assumptions have been allowed to have such very real and dramatic consequences. That non-legal opinion is having serious consequences on legal matters. It tells me that society has not come very far from the days of the Salem witch hunts
19braves77 said:Seems Joe was a very judgmental person on issues that didn't pertain to him:
http://www.csnphilly.com/pages/news_ncaa?blockID=592092
thefatguy said:You said it, CREEEEPYYYYY
It is very late for what if's. The damage is done. No trust.hive17 said:OK, regarding Sandusky's claimed innocence: what if, for some unforseen reason, he is found not guilty of all charges? And i don't mean that there was some BS procedural loophole or something. What if, between testimony of him and the victims, there isn't enough proof to convict? I think McQuery is already screwing things up for the prosecution, since we can't seem to get an exact account of what he saw and/or did.
Now, I don't think this will happen (hell, if it does, Sandusky can live in fear for the rest of his life). BUT, if it does, what would that mean for the university? What would that mean for Paterno? These guys are have already been executed in the court of public opinion.
Sandusky could always take the Michael Jackson route and buy his way out of all charges. Not sure if he has that much money though.nosterbor said:It is very late for what if's. The damage is done. No trust.hive17 said:OK, regarding Sandusky's claimed innocence: what if, for some unforseen reason, he is found not guilty of all charges? And i don't mean that there was some BS procedural loophole or something. What if, between testimony of him and the victims, there isn't enough proof to convict? I think McQuery is already screwing things up for the prosecution, since we can't seem to get an exact account of what he saw and/or did.
Now, I don't think this will happen (hell, if it does, Sandusky can live in fear for the rest of his life). BUT, if it does, what would that mean for the university? What would that mean for Paterno? These guys are have already been executed in the court of public opinion.