Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Prizm

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

MGiuseffi

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
388
Reaction score
0
Hey all. I opened some Prizm this mornng. A few decent hits, but something seemed off to me. Look at this scan and let me know if you can guess what it is:
0417PZRefLot2_zps8d13d2ba.gif
 

Bob Loblaw

Active member
Joined
Aug 21, 2008
Messages
11,216
Reaction score
15
Location
Bright House Field
The fact that they're ugly cards?
The fact that there's no MLB Logo (This was obviously going to be the case).
The fact that there are "RCs" that aren't RCs?
The fact that this is a 2012 product being issued over 100 days into 2013?
 

MGiuseffi

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
388
Reaction score
0
Just realized they are marketing this stuff as a 2012 release, thus the RC of Darvish, Harper, etc... What a joke! Next week, they may just come out with 1951 Prizm with a Mantle RC...
 

goldenegg1

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
4,100
Reaction score
0
This may be the first big fail of 2013, or 2012 or whatever year Panini wants it to be.
Hell it is so late in 2013, I'm expecting Prestige 2014 to come out next week.
 

MGiuseffi

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
388
Reaction score
0
Personally, I don't think a card can be too shiny. Just my opinion. I like my shinys... The Seaver Gold #/10 I pulled is a real stunner. So, there are some nice things about this release. One of my pet peeves is collation. Let's just say, Panini has yet to master the "art of collation"...Sigh

Overall, I give the product a C+. With Panini not having to pay MLB, I was hoping this product would have more money put into content. Sadly, I was mistaken.
 

predatorkj

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
11,871
Reaction score
2
Dude, I actually think those look really cool. Not having an MLB license sucks because of the lack of logos but the cards aren't bad looking.
 

joey12508

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
45,046
Reaction score
22,947
Location
Winterfell
so many doggie downers on here. if you dont like the product dont buy it.
 

HPC

New member
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
6,709
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix, AZ
I don't think the cards are ugly but the fact that it's called a 2012 release is disgusting
 

moxacaine

Active member
Administrator
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
17,349
Reaction score
2
Location
Fredericksburg, VA
I like them, theyre nice but being 2012 is stupid. Just like Topps and them releasing 2012 Turkey Red Football.
 

apbtpat

New member
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
No logo on hats kinda stinks!


Sent from my iPad using Freedom Card Board mobile app
 

Bruin7

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
2,132
Reaction score
0
Location
FL
Both Elite Extra and National Treasures don't have logos and NT was a 2012 release that came out in 2013. But why is everyone ok with those?

Allen
 

rsmath

Active member
Joined
Nov 8, 2008
Messages
6,086
Reaction score
1
are the base cards also chrome-like or just paper-based?

I keep seeing Panini talk about the chrome cards from this product but it's not apparent to me if the chrome cards are the norm or if they are the few premium cards found in each box.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top