Question for CHROMIES

[hofautos]

Just curious, if a player has a chrome refractor rookie, but does not have a chrome refractor AUTO rookie, what would you rather have:

1. BOWMAN CHROME REFRACTOR NON-AUTO ROOKIE
2. TOPPS ROOKIE AUTO

Also please state if you consider yourself a "CHROMIE" or not.

 

[shephech]

I mean I voted for the non-auto'd ref, but I guess it would come down to who the players on the card are.

Say:

Matt Tolbert Refractor Vs. Alex Gordon Topps Chrome RC Auto, I would take the Gordon for sure.

But in most cases I will take the Ref non-auto'd over a topps chrome auto.

And yes I guess I consider myself a "Chromie" love the look of the chrome! but love HOF Auto's and GU too.

 

[hofautos]

I mean if the card is of the same year of the same player.

 

[ThoseBackPages]

i guess im a "chromie", but i have a love of mlb rookie cards.

id go with the auto, if they are both issued in the same year

 

[hofautos]

I am trying to decide which of these two to keep for my PC, and selling the other.
I like to collect record holders.

 

[ThoseBackPages]

id keep the auto

 

[hofautos]

id keep the auto

Thanks for your input...anyone else?

 

[NerfXerks]

I'd keep both. You can never have too many cards!

Chromie here

I'll take the refractor. Shinyyyyyyyyyyy