So Panini, which one is it, game worn or event worn???

[mstng99tim]

Look at the wording at the top right on the front of the card. Then read the wording on the back of the card. Seems kind of fracked up to me. What do you thing about it?

http://cgi.ebay.com/National-Treasures- ... 2eaabeec96

 

[Groat]

D'oh! ::facepalm:: That's absolutely, 100% event worn. No game worn rookie stuff in the set as far as I know. Must be a typo, but something that shouldn't have made it to press.

 

[RITM]

Yikes. Pretty large mistake with the wording on the front of the card.

 

[THECARDFATHER]

Sucks. This is not good.

 

[cwells46]

They have screwed NT up so bad this year it makes me cry

 

[deceptikon1978]

They have screwed NT up so bad this year it makes me cry

From what I've seen so far I have to agree. My favorite product since 06

 

[tribefan2427]

They have screwed NT up so bad this year it makes me cry

From what I've seen so far I have to agree. My favorite product since 06

i have to agree. i have also liked the design of the cards to. this year its just a 400 dollar box of playoff prestige

 

[Gellman]

I saw that when these cards first came out, looks like a typo.

I also like those COLOSSAL pieces of laundry tag that are smaller than the size of the normal swatches. I get that its a tag, but change the name then.

 

[RITM]

It will be interesting to see how some people will try to manipulate the wording in their advantage. I could see someone picking some of these up and auctioning them with only the front of the card scanned for the auction.

 

[tenclubber]

Looks like their QC screwed the pooch on this one. When you are asking collectors to shell out $400 for a box of product, it needs to void of errors. Granted, there is always something that slips by, but this is directly on the front of the card in somewhat bold letters. ::facepalm::

 

[rymflaherty]

Count me as someone who had just seen the front scans and assumed they were game-worn.

I was actually going to comment in another thread about that and give Panini a lot of credit for getting game worn jersey's.....because it would be possible considering it is a high-end release and it is coming at the end of the season.
Guess I was wrong. Why bother paying for game-used though when they probably made each player wear enough jersey's to fill products for the next 3 years. ::facepalm:: Pretty lame on their part though to design the card with that wording and it really sucks for anyone who places a premium on true gu'd over event worn cards.

 

[200lbhockeyplayer]

Is it not possible that the players were playing a game of poker in these jerseys?

Therefore would it not be "gameworn"? It certainly doesn't say NFL game worn.

 

[mstng99tim]

Ahhhh, touche my friend, touche!!!

 

[G $MONEY$]

Huge Error ::facepalm::


Like seriously, how does something like this happen?? Its on the friggin front of the card!!! :benson:

 

[cwells46]

Is it not possible that the players were playing a game of poker in these jerseys?

Therefore would it not be "gameworn"? It certainly doesn't say NFL game worn.

Tiddlywinks FTW?