So the 2016 Topps 1/1 Buybacks are not really 1/1....

[PeteD]

Speaking of buybacks, i pulled this beauty out of a jumbo pack that cost me $17 (Cdn). Gee thanks Topps!

 

[RStadlerASU22]

Speaking of buybacks, i pulled this beauty out of a jumbo pack that cost me $17 (Cdn). Gee thanks Topps!

View attachment 59035

Please tell me that's Photoshopped or you tore it up...???

Ryan

 

[bongo870]

Speaking of buybacks, i pulled this beauty out of a jumbo pack that cost me $17 (Cdn). Gee thanks Topps!

View attachment 59035

WOW just WOW gem mint if i do say so myself!

 

[PeteD]

Please tell me that's Photoshopped or you tore it up...???

Ryan

nope...that's what i pulled. Still scratching my head.

 

[IUjapander]

Speaking of buybacks, i pulled this beauty out of a jumbo pack that cost me $17 (Cdn). Gee thanks Topps!

View attachment 59035

That is a very intricate die cut design

 

[RStadlerASU22]

nope...that's what i pulled. Still scratching my head.

There is no excuse for that...

Ryan

 

[PeteD]

That is a very intricate die cut design

 

[wigglytuff]

you're not kidding, that's actually impressive...
sometimes you wonder if it's actually as much about the contempt as it is the money with some of these 'products'

 

[PeteD]

Looks like quality control was asleep packing that box. Found 20 cards without the foil Topps logo, and 12 with the logo out of line.

 

[patrick182]

Regarding these two '87 Topps Andre Dawson 1/1s, they are, indeed, two different cards. Take a look at the placement of the 65th logo on the top right of each card - two different locations. Neither are OPC; we've established that. Either these are two base Topps, and indeed these 1/1s aren't actually true 1/1s or one is a Tiffany. That's it; that's all we can assume.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/38153773491...8.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT=&rmvSB=true

http://www.ebay.com/itm/29167750860...8.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT=&rmvSB=true