Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Sweet Spot

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

pigskincardboard

New member
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
5,444
Reaction score
0
Location
Toronto
Russ S. said:
pigskincardboard said:
So to whoever called me a *********: Eat a bag of dicks.


Finally,

Who am I trying to scam? What the hell are you guys talking about? I should be banned for raising possibilities?

Some of you guys are just looking for shat.

WOw. Classy!

Well, do you homework and a little research before you call out a very respected member and kick dirt on him.

You are the newbie here, so all the dirt coming your way is warranted there partner.

I'll edit it, but I think that calling me a ********* was a little harsh.

Here's the thing: I didn't say All In Cards did anything wrong, I'm simply saying it's a freakin' possibility. I apologize if it was taken as criticism, as it wasn't meant as such.

It seems as though many people vouch for his character, which is as much as you can ask from the internet. However, i think it was pretty insane how quickly people jumped down my throat for saying that people do that kind of thing.

My post went somehow got transformed from a possibility into an assertion, and that's not what I wanted.
 

pigskincardboard

New member
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
5,444
Reaction score
0
Location
Toronto
George_Calfas said:
pigskincardboard said:
So to whoever called me a *********: Eat a bag of dicks.

SECONDLY,

to whoever called me out on my statistical knowledge: Did the fact that i presented ROUNDED numbers give you a hint that I didn't do sophisticated numbers? Normally, when you provide ROUNDED numbers, it means that you're doing straight probability.

No your numbers are not even close, rounded or not.

Without variables, what did you expect? As it stands, I'm confident to proclaim that the odds of the sweetspot auto being in any given slot are 1 in 6.
 

pigskincardboard

New member
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
5,444
Reaction score
0
Location
Toronto
LaneyB said:
No eh? Maybe you're not Canadian. :o

I'm Canadian, and I'm pretty mild-mannered.

I do tend to over-analyze things, though. T'is the nature of the beast. What I'm having problems with is the nature of this community where abstract thought is taken as a personal jab.

When I make a personal jab, I make it infinitely clear by including ridiculous metaphors or crude language.
 

nyc3

Active member
Joined
Aug 20, 2008
Messages
5,305
Reaction score
0
pigskincardboard said:
Here's the thing: I didn't say All In Cards did anything wrong, I'm simply saying it's a freakin' possibility. I apologize if it was taken as criticism, as it wasn't meant as such.

It seems as though many people vouch for his character, which is as much as you can ask from the internet. However, i think it was pretty insane how quickly people jumped down my throat for saying that people do that kind of thing.

My post went somehow got transformed from a possibility into an assertion, and that's not what I wanted.


Well here is the other thing who made you a superhero who needs to swoop into topics of well respected members and do the math of being riped off? I am pretty sure no one summoned captain pocket protector in Andrews topic.
 

pigskincardboard

New member
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
5,444
Reaction score
0
Location
Toronto
nyc3 said:
pigskincardboard said:
Here's the thing: I didn't say All In Cards did anything wrong, I'm simply saying it's a freakin' possibility. I apologize if it was taken as criticism, as it wasn't meant as such.

It seems as though many people vouch for his character, which is as much as you can ask from the internet. However, i think it was pretty insane how quickly people jumped down my throat for saying that people do that kind of thing.

My post went somehow got transformed from a possibility into an assertion, and that's not what I wanted.


Well here is the other thing who made you a superhero who needs to swoop into topics of well respected members and do the math of being riped off? I am pretty sure no one summoned captain pocket protector in Andrews topic.

You definitely have a point. I definitely don't really look at post-count prior to responding. I was just browsing the threads and I think I misunderstood something:

But... $87 minus 2% Ebay bucks and 8% Microsoft Cashback = $78.30

No offense but for my money, I would rather buy it myself at a lower price and get the pleasure of opening the product myself.

I understood that as getting it from one of the giant card companies that don't do breaks, guarantees you an untampered box whereby getting it through the form for say a dollar or two cheaper doesn't.

Character aside, I stand by my statement.
 

Mr.Whipple

Banned
Joined
Apr 19, 2009
Messages
3,822
Reaction score
0
Location
Joisey
When, I buy wax its unopened boxes only, But every box of Triple Threads, I ever bought has the auto in the top pack.. Never really noticed till two old members of BMB told me. Both were pack searchers and will admit to it. I am almost sure one joined here.. But the shop we all went to is now out of business, He allowed them to search packs and then would lie and say nothing came out of the box.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top