TheFiveMajors - Strasburg Auto Sales - Anybody Receive?

[EricInCT]

Just for clarification I paid regular paypal with a cc not gift. And I think Randy Shields is a fairly reputable member and he is in agreement with me that thefivemajors is a thief or at least exhibits thief-like behavior, in which case the "if it walks like a duck rule" automatically goes into effect.

Fairly reputable? Just fairly reputable?

Randy is a gentleman and a scholar. :ugeek:

 

[nyc3]

I am very confident that won't happen. I am done with the back and forth I posted on the feedback forum just to give me experience with a member nothing more and nothing less than that.

Are you high? You done nothing but scream the sky is falling since the first day, this is just another example. I would hope at the least the mods will mark your account with being a raving lunatic if and when you get your card so this doesnt happen again. But even if not the people at FCB have a sick memory you will never live this one down.

 

[Anthony K.]

Just for clarification I paid regular paypal with a cc not gift. And I think Randy Shields is a fairly reputable member and he is in agreement with me that thefivemajors is a thief or at least exhibits thief-like behavior, in which case the "if it walks like a duck rule" automatically goes into effect.

You are saying because ONE person agrees that he exhibits thief like behavior, he must be?

What exactly will you say if the Strasburg shows up? I mean, after calling a guy a thief, publicly outing him the SAME night you paid for a card and THEN it shows up?

I'd hope you would post a picture of you with your foot in your mouth. Literally.

I would still drop a negative on him if you paid for overnight.

I doubt that.

I am sure you would first come to the boards with ANOTHER problem, then ask us all for advice on what to do.

Then do whatever the board tells you to do.

Not like you've ever done that before or anything.

 

[EricInCT]

[quote="Anthony K.":2fx4dasz]

Just for clarification I paid regular paypal with a cc not gift. And I think Randy Shields is a fairly reputable member and he is in agreement with me that thefivemajors is a thief or at least exhibits thief-like behavior, in which case the "if it walks like a duck rule" automatically goes into effect.

You are saying because ONE person agrees that he exhibits thief like behavior, he must be?

What exactly will you say if the Strasburg shows up? I mean, after calling a guy a thief, publicly outing him the SAME night you paid for a card and THEN it shows up?

I'd hope you would post a picture of you with your foot in your mouth. Literally.

I would still drop a negative on him if you paid for overnight.

I doubt that.

I am sure you would first come to the boards with ANOTHER problem, then ask us all for advice on what to do.

Then do whatever the board tells you to do.

Not like you've ever done that before or anything.[/quote:2fx4dasz]


Drop the neg bomb on him.

 

[Sly]

All I know is that TheFiveMajors needs to keep track of the tracking number to danimal, cause I guarantee that if it arrives, danimal will NOT come on here and admit it arrived or issue an apology.

 

[boomo]

I said it in trader info, and I'll say it here:

Until that package arrives empty, danimal is jumping the gun.

The DC# (04969001623023094022) shows acceptance at the guy's local PO on THURSDAY. That means it's just now on it's 3rd day of transit.

"thief" needs to be reserved until the actual crime has taken place. Until then,t he guy is just a bad communicator. Holy hell, people, he's not a business... he's an average everyday guy that makes friggen mistakes. If he was out to straight up steal your money, I doubt he would have wasted time even TRYING to defend himself.

Seriously, first it was "OMG HE TRIED TO SELL 5 STRASBURGS WHEN HE OBVIOUSLY ONLY HAS ONE OMG~". Then, we he posts a pic (albeit, not professional) it was "OMG THE PIC IS FAKE MAKE IT CLOSER OMG WTF". Then, when it is pointed out that the sigs are different, the autograph stamp is there and that there is no facsimile auto it's "OMG THE DC NUMBER HE SENT ME ISN'T UPDATED IN THE 2 DAYS IT'S HAD IN TRANSIT! OMFG THIEF!"

Yeah, he didn't send overnight express. Whoop. Wait until you get the package, then try to contact him about a partial refund on the shipping.

But it doesn't show as being in transit.

The U.S. Postal Service has received electronic notification from our Automated Postal Center (APC) in OLATHE, KS 66061 on July 1, 2010 to expect your shipment for mailing.

It shows that he bought some shipping at a machine, not that it was ever mailed.

i have been using electronic mail and have mailed 6000 packages in the last 2 years, 99.9 % with DC.
the rules of Dc are simple it ONLY HAS to be scanned at the end destination, it does not need to be scanned anywhere else.
depending on the route the mail takes thru a large mailing house or maybe a smaller one, it CAN be scanned at every stop
but does not have to be. It all depends on the route, the workers, the way it is handled from A to B. If he gets his package today, that message will change to delivered, and that will be it. Hope this helps.

Congratulations, but you are not the only person who has shipped countless packages in their time.

I'm not saying this guy didn't mail anything, I'm saying that the information provided online does not prove it was shipped. Also, packages that show no median tracking are in the minority of those who do.

isnt that basically what i said?

 

[A_Pharis]

Just for clarification I paid regular paypal with a cc not gift. And I think Randy Shields is a fairly reputable member and he is in agreement with me that thefivemajors is a thief or at least exhibits thief-like behavior, in which case the "if it walks like a duck rule" automatically goes into effect.

You are saying because ONE person agrees that he exhibits thief like behavior, he must be?

What exactly will you say if the Strasburg shows up? I mean, after calling a guy a thief, publicly outing him the SAME night you paid for a card and THEN it shows up?

I'd hope you would post a picture of you with your foot in your mouth. Literally.

I'd be pretty pissed if wrongfully called a thief. To put it lightly. Isn't that libel?

 

[vetsgt02]

Just for clarification I paid regular paypal with a cc not gift. And I think Randy Shields is a fairly reputable member and he is in agreement with me that thefivemajors is a thief or at least exhibits thief-like behavior, in which case the "if it walks like a duck rule" automatically goes into effect.

::facepalm:: ::facepalm:: ::facepalm::

 

[EricInCT]

[quote="Anthony K.":3npgrnre]

Just for clarification I paid regular paypal with a cc not gift. And I think Randy Shields is a fairly reputable member and he is in agreement with me that thefivemajors is a thief or at least exhibits thief-like behavior, in which case the "if it walks like a duck rule" automatically goes into effect.

You are saying because ONE person agrees that he exhibits thief like behavior, he must be?

What exactly will you say if the Strasburg shows up? I mean, after calling a guy a thief, publicly outing him the SAME night you paid for a card and THEN it shows up?

I'd hope you would post a picture of you with your foot in your mouth. Literally.

I'd be pretty pissed if wrongfully called a thief. To put it lightly. Isn't that libel?[/quote:3npgrnre]


Maybe we should consult an internet sport chatroom lawyer :benson:

 

[mudflap02]

Unfortunately I am an internet chat room scientist.

 

[vetsgt02]

there should be an IQ test for trading

 

[A_Pharis]

You're right, he does exhibit SO MUCH thief-like behavior.

I know TONS of thieves return to the scene to defend themselves.
I know TONS of thieves provide pics with pretty specific evidence of having the items in question.
I know TONS of thieves provide DC.

Now, I know some thieves do provide false DC #'s, but you need to see what is actually delivered. The guy has done everything asked of him, and - to be frank about it - I wouldn't answer your ********* PMs, because I guarantee if you call him out like this publicly at the drop of a dime then your private conversations must be pretty friggen dandy.

If he didn't ship express - meh. What was the price difference? Ask him CIVILLY for that difference back. Holy crap, man.

Danimal - honestly it kind of comes off like you were hoping to make a quick buck by flipping it, and now you're all menstrual because it didn't get shipped right away. The guy probably has a life (including getting his damn car fixed). You are protected since you didn't gift (which I thought had been indicated the other day) so why blow a nut in your drawers, because the mail didn't get it to you in 3 days?

 

[A_Pharis]

[quote="Anthony K.":3tnfu64g]

Just for clarification I paid regular paypal with a cc not gift. And I think Randy Shields is a fairly reputable member and he is in agreement with me that thefivemajors is a thief or at least exhibits thief-like behavior, in which case the "if it walks like a duck rule" automatically goes into effect.

You are saying because ONE person agrees that he exhibits thief like behavior, he must be?

What exactly will you say if the Strasburg shows up? I mean, after calling a guy a thief, publicly outing him the SAME night you paid for a card and THEN it shows up?

I'd hope you would post a picture of you with your foot in your mouth. Literally.

I'd be pretty pissed if wrongfully called a thief. To put it lightly. Isn't that libel?

Maybe we should consult an internet sport chatroom lawyer :benson:[/quote:3tnfu64g]

Actually, the case could be made that the feedback system is considered published statements meant to defame his character and prevent future income... so, yeah.

But, as said of you earlier, you wouldn't know what to do in this situation without a thread with a poll, would you?

 

[vetsgt02]

After all this I hope you are ready to give this guy a big time apology when your card gets there but I am sure you will get it in the mail and magicaly never mention it again so that you will not have to admit you ran this guy through the ringer for now reason.

 

[EricInCT]

You're right, he does exhibit SO MUCH thief-like behavior.

I know TONS of thieves return to the scene to defend themselves.
I know TONS of thieves provide pics with pretty specific evidence of having the items in question.
I know TONS of thieves provide DC.
Now, I know some thieves do provide false DC #'s, but you need to see what is actually delivered. The guy has done everything asked of him, and - to be frank about it - I wouldn't answer your ********* PMs, because I guarantee if you call him out like this publicly at the drop of a dime then your private conversations must be pretty friggen dandy.

If he didn't ship express - meh. What was the price difference? Ask him CIVILLY for that difference back. Holy crap, man.

Danimal - honestly it kind of comes off like you were hoping to make a quick buck by flipping it, and now you're all menstrual because it didn't get shipped right away. The guy probably has a life (including getting his damn car fixed). You are protected since you didn't gift (which I thought had been indicated the other day) so why blow a nut in your drawers, because the mail didn't get it to you in 3 days?

The compassion and communication he shows allows him to rip off others. Guy took me for $600 gift paypal last year and amazingly he sent it to me back a month later.

I have proof he scammed others to pay me back. He had a good heart just a strange way of asking to borrow money....he had pics and stamped DC receipts from the post office scanned.

 

[A_Pharis]

Who are you talking about? This guy?

 

[leatherman]

Unfortunately I am an internet chat room scientist.

And I am an internet mathematician/statistician.

Currently, the odds are 8:1 that (after the card arrives) danimal will have a problem with the condition of said card.

There is no way that we have heard the last about this.

db

 

[EricInCT]

[quote="A_Pharis":cqb6jjoh][quote="Anthony K.":cqb6jjoh]

Just for clarification I paid regular paypal with a cc not gift. And I think Randy Shields is a fairly reputable member and he is in agreement with me that thefivemajors is a thief or at least exhibits thief-like behavior, in which case the "if it walks like a duck rule" automatically goes into effect.

You are saying because ONE person agrees that he exhibits thief like behavior, he must be?

What exactly will you say if the Strasburg shows up? I mean, after calling a guy a thief, publicly outing him the SAME night you paid for a card and THEN it shows up?

I'd hope you would post a picture of you with your foot in your mouth. Literally.

I'd be pretty pissed if wrongfully called a thief. To put it lightly. Isn't that libel?

Maybe we should consult an internet sport chatroom lawyer :benson:[/quote:cqb6jjoh]

Actually, the case could be made that the feedback system is considered published statements meant to defame his character and prevent future income... so, yeah.

But, as said of you earlier, you wouldn't know what to do in this situation without a thread with a poll, would you?[/quote:cqb6jjoh]


You seemed to be really concerned about something that doesn't include you and with 6 trades you have little experience yourself so maybe you should stop meddling? :?

 

[EricInCT]

Unfortunately I am an internet chat room scientist.

And I am an internet mathematician/statistician.

Currently, the odds are 8:1 that (after the card arrives) danimal will have a problem with the condition of said card.

There is no way that we have heard the last about this.

db

Vegas is currently at 6:1.

 

[A_Pharis]

So you can white knight danimal, but no one can step up for someone who hasn't been given time to prove anything either way?

Oh, ok. Danimal made it EVERYONE's business the minute he posted about his woes publicly instead of handling it with the trade mods. If he - or you - don't want my opinion then foe me or stop acting like babies.

But, yes.. because I don't do deals on FCB then I clearly have no experience with transactions.

It's not like I spend money everyday, right?
I hear FCB transactions are the total indicator of someone's level of spending competency.