G $MONEY$ said:Everything that predatorkj is saying is true!! I have the same college text book....
![]()
Thanked :lol:
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
G $MONEY$ said:Everything that predatorkj is saying is true!! I have the same college text book....
![]()
If you take steroids you are using a performance enahancing drug. I can't believe you would say that water and weights are performance enhancing. I literally laughed out loud. There's a difference between things that are natural like water, hard work like weight lifting, and mental preperation like game tape. If you can't see that, I really don't know what to say. Any chemical concoction engineered to take control of your body and "improve" it is just wrong. It's different than a protein mix, because that's a natural thigns found in foods, and the body processes it, not the other way around. It's the same as a vitamin - just the natural contents of food packed into one place.fengzhang said:Card Magnet said:When weed starts to improve your physique and gives you an edge, I'll view it as negatively as I do steroids.
You are missing the point.
There are many things that are performance enhancing. Let's start with water. A severely dehydrated player would definitely not perform at peak level. You can throw protein powder, watching tapes, lifting weights, etc. into the mix.
So, how do we decide what is acceptable for an athlete to use?
1) Whether it's illegal or not. If it's illegal, an athlete shouldn't use it.
2) Whether the MLB has a strict policy against it or not.
#2 was missing for the 1990's and the early part of the 2000's as evidenced by the fact there were no baseball sanctions in place against steroid use. So, the argument people used to nail guys like Bonds and other early users of steroids was the fact they were doing something illegal. And, as I noted at the time, if you want to attack players using that argument, that's fine. But, that means we should bring the hammer down on players who do anything illegal, like Lincecum in this case. That is what bodiaz is getting at.
andyduke86 said:Hallsgator said:Lally1 said:Honestly, just plain stupidity on his part for smoking while driving and speeding...
But then again, its not like he was doing crack or meth. Its weed..
But that is the danger with weed. It's not that harmful by itself, but it is a gateway drug and can lead to the use of more dangerous illicit drugs.
LOL, I'm not even going to touch that one. Totally false and unsubstantiated claim.
thegreathambino said:maybe in 2010 products we will see a game used blunt card of Lincy
fengzhang said:Let me explain this again:
Who decides what is "cheating?"
1) MLB
2) The federal government (by declaring certain things illegal)
Not cheating: water, gatorade, video tapes, weights, Lasik
Cheating: corked bats, spitballs, etc.
Gray zone: steroids
I put steroids in the gray zone because although MLB "banned" steroids, they had no punishments in place. They were essentially complicit with steroid use, especially when home runs started bringing fans back to the stadium.
When this issue is brought up to defend the Sosas or Bonds of the world, the typical argument is that MLB didn't need a policy in place because steroids were already illegal. These players were demonized as horrible people because they were criminals who broke the law. Hence, if breaking the steroids law is such a bad thing, then using marijuana is equally bad because you are still using an illicit drug. But, the double standard is once again instituted as we see in this thread.
In my opinion, any steroid use before 2003 is not any different from Lincecum's marijuana use because MLB didn't have a rock solid policy against steroids before then. In effect, they condoned steroid use just like they condone drinking water during the game on a hot day or lifting weights in between games. Hence, before 2003, steroid use was illegal but not "cheating." Marijuana use today is illegal but not cheating as well.
Basically, many fans equate "performance enhancing" with "cheating" which is not correct. But, many simply can't comprehend this logic.
andyduke86 said:I'm fairly certain I'm more highly educated than you are.
leatherman said:Ah, the weed thread.
It was bound to happen. It would never have lasted on the BMB for obvious reasons. But here on FCB, I can wake up to a 16 page discussion on marijuana use.
I would like a few more polls:
1. How many people were baked when they posted in the weed thread?
2. How many people were sober when they first read the weed thread, and then decided to go smoke a bowl?
3. How many of you have used resealable team bags to store weed?
4. How many of you are now going to use team bags to store weed?
5. How many of you are now jonesing because you are out of weed, you're reading about weed, but it's currently "dry" where you live?
David
100% serious......and i don't live in cities like oakland. its is a probem.CAROLINA BOSOX said:darocker80 said:I like how someone in the thread was making false accusations and weird examples when his only reference was a movie. And arguing against people who have had smoked.
And kinda OT but apparently there were 6-7th graders at a school in the bay area who got expelled for being high in class and having X and weed on them...baha
6-7TH GRADERS? You actually think this is funny? You have shown your immaturity now, this is just plain stupid. Medicinal use of marijuana is fine if it relieves the patient's pain. Any other use is just your Dealer's propaganda you are buying into. When you guys grow up and have responsibilities like homes and families then you will realize all this need a "getaway" is overrated.
I started smoking cigarettes in like 6th grade, and smoked weed and drank for the first times in 7th grade. Assuming memory serves me right.darocker80 said:100% serious......and i don't live in cities like oakland. its is a probem.CAROLINA BOSOX said:darocker80 said:I like how someone in the thread was making false accusations and weird examples when his only reference was a movie. And arguing against people who have had smoked.
And kinda OT but apparently there were 6-7th graders at a school in the bay area who got expelled for being high in class and having X and weed on them...baha
6-7TH GRADERS? You actually think this is funny? You have shown your immaturity now, this is just plain stupid. Medicinal use of marijuana is fine if it relieves the patient's pain. Any other use is just your Dealer's propaganda you are buying into. When you guys grow up and have responsibilities like homes and families then you will realize all this need a "getaway" is overrated.
:?:AKT74 said:Am I the only person who finds it hysterical that the guy who seems to have the biggest problem with weed on this post (predatorkj) is a huge Bagwell collector?
darocker80 said:Its a misdemeanor. He got fined, not a big deal. Def not worse than steroids.....
and i wouldn't mind smokin it up with tim lincecum any day hahaha.