Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Top 50 Prospects

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

TheGamesBest

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
Location
White Plains, NY
cgilmo said:
TheGamesBest said:
jbone17 said:
I do like your sleeper in Adrian! ;)

Thanks... Cardenas is the man.

About the Friedrich being ranked so low. I do think he has the talent to be higher but I'm scared of Colorado pitchers.


And yet Matzek is #19?


Matzek throws minimum of 5mph harder and is 3 years younger. That looks like more upside to me.
 

TheGamesBest

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
Location
White Plains, NY
TheGamesBest said:
cgilmo said:
TheGamesBest said:
jbone17 said:
I do like your sleeper in Adrian! ;)

Thanks... Cardenas is the man.

About the Friedrich being ranked so low. I do think he has the talent to be higher but I'm scared of Colorado pitchers.


And yet Matzek is #19?


Matzek throws minimum of 5mph harder and is 3 years younger. That looks like more upside to me.


But your right Matzek should be pushed give or take 5 down. I won't argue that.
 

All The Hype

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
10,250
Reaction score
0
Location
Indianapolis
cgilmo said:
Your Logan Morrison ranking is criminal.

No kidding, he's easily top 25 and maybe even top 10 in my book.

Decent list though, I enjoyed your comments on each player.
 

mwashuc06

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
3,453
Reaction score
1
Chuck James numbers in the minors 31-18 2.24 ERA 517 K's in 465 IP. You would think he was a future CY winner according to numbers in the minors. Bumgarner arguably has less stuff than James does if he can't get his fastball popping over 92 again. Bumgarner isn't even a top 20 prospect for me.
 

darocker80

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
15,534
Reaction score
0
Location
Lincecum Land
mwashuc06 said:
Chuck James numbers in the minors 31-18 2.24 ERA 517 K's in 465 IP. You would think he was a future CY winner according to numbers in the minors. Bumgarner arguably has less stuff than James does if he can't get his fastball popping over 92 again. Bumgarner isn't even a top 20 prospect for me.
Its called end of season fatigue. He's 20, and is still developing/getting stronger.

Guaranteed in spring you'll see 95's on the radar...
 

Jaypers

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
49,743
Reaction score
2,715
Location
IL
For those interested, I will be posting my annual Top 100 Prospects list by the end of this week.
 

HoustonTeams4Me

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2008
Messages
4,249
Reaction score
0
beefycheddar said:
Green absolutely demolished the Cape League in 2008. What more do you need to see in a player than that? Output wise it is a close comparison to High A or Double A and he demolished the league. His .348 average was fourth in the league as he was among the league leaders in most offensive categories...he was second in the league for runs scored (37) and slugging percentage (.537) and third in hits (56), doubles (12) and extra-base hits (19)...his .451 on-base percentage was the fifth-highest in the league...he was 10-for-13 in stolen bases..

He also was great in college, what more do you need to see?


I love me some Grant Green & am a believer but I'm curious as to what makes you think the underlined statement of your's above is so?
As I don't see any correlation/similarities between the Cape Cod League & High A, or especially Double-A, besides the young player's whom may 1 day be in High A and/or Double A (once they've actually matured, acclimated themselves to the sport of baseball enough, & earned thier promotion's to such level)...Which if this happens to be the only correlation/similarities that you're using to justify your opinion when stating what you did, then what is the difference in your statement & someone who states that the Rookie/Pioneer League is in close comparison, output wise, to High A or Double A???

Other than what I feel to be a false comparison between the Cape Cod League & High A/Double A, I do agree with you on Grant Green's evaluation (he does look like he's something "special" & has alot to offer baseball & prospector's alike)! :D
 

darocker80

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
15,534
Reaction score
0
Location
Lincecum Land
HoustonTeams4Me said:
beefycheddar said:
Green absolutely demolished the Cape League in 2008. What more do you need to see in a player than that? Output wise it is a close comparison to High A or Double A and he demolished the league. His .348 average was fourth in the league as he was among the league leaders in most offensive categories...he was second in the league for runs scored (37) and slugging percentage (.537) and third in hits (56), doubles (12) and extra-base hits (19)...his .451 on-base percentage was the fifth-highest in the league...he was 10-for-13 in stolen bases..

He also was great in college, what more do you need to see?


I love me some Grant Green & am a believer but I'm curious as to what makes you think the underlined statement of your's above is so?
As I don't see any correlation/similarities between the Cape Cod League & High A, or especially Double-A, besides the young player's whom may 1 day be in High A and/or Double A (once they've actually matured, acclimated themselves to the sport of baseball enough, & earned thier promotion's to such level)...Which if this happens to be the only correlation/similarities that you're using to justify your opinion when stating what you did, then what is the difference in your statement & someone who states that the Rookie/Pioneer League is in close comparison, output wise, to High A or Double A???

Other than what I feel to be a false comparison between the Cape Cod League & High A/Double A, I do agree with you on Grant Green's evaluation (he does look like he's something "special" & has alot to offer baseball & prospector's alike)! :D
I will admit, he makes the 2010 bowman checklist look better
 

cgilmo

Well-known member
Administrator
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
37,212
Reaction score
35
Location
Alpharetta, Georgia, United States
mwashuc06 said:
Chuck James numbers in the minors 31-18 2.24 ERA 517 K's in 465 IP. You would think he was a future CY winner according to numbers in the minors. Bumgarner arguably has less stuff than James does if he can't get his fastball popping over 92 again. Bumgarner isn't even a top 20 prospect for me.


You are reading WAY too much into statistics here. Stats only tell a half story.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top