predatorkj
Active member
- Aug 7, 2008
- 11,871
- 2
starwarsfan2003 said:Well said. But unfortunately, the pandora's box was opened in the 90's with overproduction, only that now its with GU and autos instead of inserts. But in reality, how can card companies fix the problem? Reduce the amount of GU/Autos? Reintroduce the insert with insane pull rates? No one outside of Bowman chrome products holds on to base anymore. Base cards are considered filler for most non set collector sets. When's the last time anyone was trying to complete a Triple Threads base set, or an SPx base set? No one cares like they did in the past about completing a base set.
Uhh...I am and have been trying to do as many base sets as possible for quite a while now.Just ask tonsofcommons...
My idea on this whole debacle is that while I love topps and I would always remain loyal to them...no competition will blow.I am not going to waste much money on MILB products.I just won't.I didn't do it with Tristar and I actually liked them so I am certainly not doing it with Razor or UD.Not that I won't buy singles but I am not buying a box.
We need competition in any industry.Yeah they got carried away at points but they should have a few brands making MLB cards.Just limit the number of products.Even 20 a piece for each company is a little over the top.How about 10 per company?That is plenty for each manufacturer and would give them enough breathing room to do base sets, mid level, high end level, and prospect and retired HOF types plus an extra quirky thing or two for the kids.
Like I said...I love Topps(and not because of Bowman) but no competition in any industry never works out well.Especially with what seems to be today's business model of cutting every corner you can and doing the bare minimum.