Topps Red Hot Redemption #2 Revealed

[Jaypers]

http://www.twitpic.com/1z05lk

 

[cubfan131]

Ouch! I should've sold my extra.

 

[cgilmo]

 

[matfanofold]

:?

 

[MarlinsManiac20]

This is a joke right........

 

[cgilmo]

This is a joke right........

umm no


there are always a few stinkers


i don't understand why people get upset about these

 

[matfanofold]

This is a joke right........

umm no


there are always a few stinkers


i don't understand why people get upset about these

But, but..... Tabata? Really, Tabata?

Granted they all cant be Strasburg......... But Tabata? :/

 

[MarlinsManiac20]

This is a joke right........

umm no


there are always a few stinkers


i don't understand why people get upset about these

Because out of all the top rookies this year they pick Jose Tabata? This kid isn't even doing good.
I can give you 5 people I would rather have.

 

[bmc398]

::facepalm:: :benson: ::facepalm:: :benson: ::facepalm:: :benson:

 

[hofmichael]

This is a joke right........

umm no


there are always a few stinkers


i don't understand why people get upset about these

Because out of all the top rookies this year they pick Jose Tabata? This kid isn't even doing good.
I can give you 5 people I would rather have.

^This

 

[trademhigh]

This is a joke right........

umm no


there are always a few stinkers


i don't understand why people get upset about these

Because out of all the top rookies this year they pick Jose Tabata? This kid isn't even doing good.
I can give you 5 people I would rather have.

If you can name 5 people you would rather have, then wouldn't he deserve a spot? I believe there are 10 of these, no? That means, since he is the 6th best rookie, he deserves a spot in the Topps Red Hot Rookies set.

 

[cgilmo]

There are actually 20 spots to fill

They try to have different guys in topps and finest, although there is almost always some overlap.

 

[MarlinsManiac20]

This is a joke right........

umm no


there are always a few stinkers


i don't understand why people get upset about these

Because out of all the top rookies this year they pick Jose Tabata? This kid isn't even doing good.
I can give you 5 people I would rather have.

If you can name 5 people you would rather have, then wouldn't he deserve a spot? I believe there are 10 of these, no? That means, since he is the 6th best rookie, he deserves a spot in the Topps Red Hot Rookies set.

No I'll name all 10
Carlos Santana
Buster Posey
Pedro Alverez
Mike Stanton
Mike Leake
Strasburg
Jason Heyward
Mike Leake
Austin Jackson
Brendan Bosech
Ike Davis.

Give or take a better name here and there. But thats what it should look like and I would give alverez an auto

 

[js0000001]

The only reason anyone would be disappointed it if they went out and paid too much for redemptions thinking it was going to be someone else

Everyone who sold redemptions for too much to people thinking it was going to be someone else must be pretty happy

so it balances out in the end

Does this mean everyone is going to run out and pay too much for #3?

 

[trademhigh]

This is a joke right........

umm no


there are always a few stinkers


i don't understand why people get upset about these

Because out of all the top rookies this year they pick Jose Tabata? This kid isn't even doing good.
I can give you 5 people I would rather have.

If you can name 5 people you would rather have, then wouldn't he deserve a spot? I believe there are 10 of these, no? That means, since he is the 6th best rookie, he deserves a spot in the Topps Red Hot Rookies set.

No I'll name all 10
Carlos Santana
Buster Posey
Pedro Alverez
Mike Stanton
Mike Leake
Strasburg
Jason Heyward
Mike Leake
Austin Jackson
Brendan Bosech
Ike Davis.

Give or take a better name here and there. But thats what it should look like and I would give alverez an auto

You put Mike Leake ,twice. Also, you need to name 20 because of the Topps Finest Redemptions.

 

[sportscardtheory]

Pittsburgh players are people too you know. lol

 

[bmc398]

[quote="MarlinsManiac20":2k0rvf23]This is a joke right........

umm no


there are always a few stinkers


i don't understand why people get upset about these

Because out of all the top rookies this year they pick Jose Tabata? This kid isn't even doing good.
I can give you 5 people I would rather have.

If you can name 5 people you would rather have, then wouldn't he deserve a spot? I believe there are 10 of these, no? That means, since he is the 6th best rookie, he deserves a spot in the Topps Red Hot Rookies set.

No I'll name all 10
Carlos Santana
Buster Posey
Pedro Alverez
Mike Stanton
Mike Leake
Strasburg
Jason Heyward
Mike Leake
Austin Jackson
Brendan Bosech
Ike Davis.

Give or take a better name here and there. But thats what it should look like and I would give alverez an auto

You put Mike Leake ,twice. Also, you need to name 20 because of the Topps Finest Redemptions.[/quote:2k0rvf23]
That and Jackson and Posey won't be in there because they already have RCs in the Sets already. The whole point of these is that they are guys who haven't had actual RCs in Topps at this point. There will be scrubs abound in this set im sure.

 

[thenumberonemetfan]

[quote="cgilmo":16uhj12r][quote="MarlinsManiac20":16uhj12r]This is a joke right........

umm no


there are always a few stinkers


i don't understand why people get upset about these

Because out of all the top rookies this year they pick Jose Tabata? This kid isn't even doing good.
I can give you 5 people I would rather have.

If you can name 5 people you would rather have, then wouldn't he deserve a spot? I believe there are 10 of these, no? That means, since he is the 6th best rookie, he deserves a spot in the Topps Red Hot Rookies set.

No I'll name all 10
Carlos Santana
Buster Posey
Pedro Alverez
Mike Stanton
Mike Leake
Strasburg
Jason Heyward
Mike Leake
Austin Jackson
Brendan Bosech
Ike Davis.

Give or take a better name here and there. But thats what it should look like and I would give alverez an auto

You put Mike Leake ,twice. Also, you need to name 20 because of the Topps Finest Redemptions.[/quote:16uhj12r]
That and Jackson and Posey won't be in there because they already have RCs in the Sets already. The whole point of these is that they are guys who haven't had actual RCs in Topps at this point. There will be scrubs abound in this set im sure.[/quote:16uhj12r]


and Heyward right?

 

[bmc398]

[quote="MarlinsManiac20":3azqgurs][quote="cgilmo":3azqgurs][quote="MarlinsManiac20":3azqgurs]This is a joke right........

umm no


there are always a few stinkers


i don't understand why people get upset about these

Because out of all the top rookies this year they pick Jose Tabata? This kid isn't even doing good.
I can give you 5 people I would rather have.

If you can name 5 people you would rather have, then wouldn't he deserve a spot? I believe there are 10 of these, no? That means, since he is the 6th best rookie, he deserves a spot in the Topps Red Hot Rookies set.

No I'll name all 10
Carlos Santana
Buster Posey
Pedro Alverez
Mike Stanton
Mike Leake
Strasburg
Jason Heyward
Mike Leake
Austin Jackson
Brendan Bosech
Ike Davis.

Give or take a better name here and there. But thats what it should look like and I would give alverez an auto

You put Mike Leake ,twice. Also, you need to name 20 because of the Topps Finest Redemptions.[/quote:3azqgurs]
That and Jackson and Posey won't be in there because they already have RCs in the Sets already. The whole point of these is that they are guys who haven't had actual RCs in Topps at this point. There will be scrubs abound in this set im sure.[/quote:3azqgurs]


and Heyward right?[/quote:3azqgurs]
Right. The only way id see him being in there was if he was an auto. He's #1 in Topps finest because he hadn't had a 2010 card at that point.

 

[Dice-K Collector]

This is a joke right........

umm no


there are always a few stinkers


i don't understand why people get upset about these

Because out of all the top rookies this year they pick Jose Tabata? This kid isn't even doing good.
I can give you 5 people I would rather have.

If you can name 5 people you would rather have, then wouldn't he deserve a spot? I believe there are 10 of these, no? That means, since he is the 6th best rookie, he deserves a spot in the Topps Red Hot Rookies set.

No I'll name all 10
Carlos Santana
Buster Posey
Pedro Alverez
Mike Stanton
Mike Leake
Strasburg
Jason Heyward
Mike Leake
Austin Jackson
Brendan Bosech
Ike Davis.

Give or take a better name here and there. But thats what it should look like and I would give alverez an auto

Heyward & Leake & Austin Jackson already have rookie cards, they cant be in the RHR set also.