- Thread starter
- #1
Bob Loblaw
Active member
Last I checked -- and I am a wee bit (and by wee bit, I mean, massive) of a Schmidt fan -- I didn't think his # was 33.
I would have to research my materials, but I didn't think his early # was 33. I thought it was 22. If it was 33, Topps destroyed a RARE RARE RARE early Schmidt bat.
Thoughts? Could it be ounces? But why write the # of ounces on the bat knob?
I would have to research my materials, but I didn't think his early # was 33. I thought it was 22. If it was 33, Topps destroyed a RARE RARE RARE early Schmidt bat.
Thoughts? Could it be ounces? But why write the # of ounces on the bat knob?
Last edited: