Upper Deck just doesn't learn...

[Bob Loblaw]

 

[ChasHawk]

don't get it.

 

[js0000001]

Team Logos?

 

[NECpilgrims8]

At this point, who cares anymore about the lawsuit & settlement. They will cease to exist very soon in the MLB market, how about we take it for what it is.

Those displays are SUPER-sweet!

I don't even collect autographed OML balls, but that is something I would buy.

 

[Bob Loblaw]

I was wrong. I thought the clause below included any MLB product. I guess this is allowed.

Upper Deck must receive approval from MLB for the use of baseball jerseys, pants, jackets, caps, helmets or catcher’s equipment in future products featuring players.

 

[jbhofmann]

My guess is that the pictures do not come with the case. But only a guess.

 

[ChasHawk]

My guess is that the pictures do not come with the case. But only a guess.

Correct sir.

http://store.upperdeck.com/store/Ba..._Case__Horizontal_8x10_Version____75939?Args=

 

[cgilmo]

ummm, the lawsuit has nothing to do with those products.


The lawsuit was about a certian category of licencing. Trading Cards.

 

[Seiya]

That case looks pretty awesome.

 

[ChasHawk]

That case looks pretty awesome.

It should for $99.99

:lol:

 

[Bob Loblaw]

ummm, the lawsuit has nothing to do with those products.


The lawsuit was about a certian category of licencing. Trading Cards.

Yeah. I already said I was wrong.

 

[UMich92]

Looks nice, but for $99 it better be UV protected and I see no mention of that on the website.

Alex

 

[brouthercard]

Is the second guy Raul Mondesi? :lol: :lol:

 

[200lbhockeyplayer]

Looks nice, but for $99 it better be UV protected and I see no mention of that on the website.

Alex

The UV version will be $499.

 

[andyduke86]

The pictures appear to be photofiles, which anyone call sell on the secondary market.

 

[UMich92]

Looks nice, but for $99 it better be UV protected and I see no mention of that on the website.

Alex

The UV version will be $499.

Thanks for the laugh.

 

[subpop77]

Looks nice, but for $99 it better be UV protected and I see no mention of that on the website.
Alex

The UV version will be $499.

:lol: :benson: ::facepalm::

 

[cgilmo]

ummm, the lawsuit has nothing to do with those products.


The lawsuit was about a certian category of licencing. Trading Cards.

Yeah. I already said I was wrong.

yeah, i skimmed

 

[AKT74]

ummm, the lawsuit has nothing to do with those products.


The lawsuit was about a certian category of licencing. Trading Cards.

Yeah. I already said I was wrong.

yeah, i skimmed

WHAT?? I thought you proofread every post on here.

 

[Sean_C]

The verticle one is nicer IMHO, but it doesn't mention if it's UV safe, and I'd rather spend $100 on cards or autographs than on displays.