Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Wanna know what's frustrating?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

card-treasury

New member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
0
Buying a vending case, and finally getting lucky. All cards cut unbelievably sharp. Sending them into BGS for grading and having them say they are trimmed. UNBELIEVABLE.

Can't catch the real trimmed cards, but tell me mine are when I know for a fact otherwise.
 

JoshHamilton

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
12,205
Reaction score
320
Beckett rejecting cards as trimmed? Did you submit 1992 Topps Micro cards and put regular 1992 Topps on the submission form or something?
 

Jaypers

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
49,739
Reaction score
2,714
Location
IL
card-treasury said:
1989-90 OPC hockey.

Did you measure them before sending them in? I've learned the hard way that you should always do so, especially for older cards.
 

card-treasury

New member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
0
JoshHamilton said:
Beckett rejecting cards as trimmed? Did you submit 1992 Topps Micro cards and put regular 1992 Topps on the submission form or something?
And they aren't trimmed. On top of that, BGS and PSA both graded cards from the case before.
 

JoshHamilton

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
12,205
Reaction score
320
card-treasury said:
1989-90 OPC hockey.

Now that's hilarious.

There are thousands of sheet cut OPC cards sitting in BGS 9.5 and 10 holders
 

card-treasury

New member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
0
JoshHamilton said:
card-treasury said:
1989-90 OPC hockey.

Now that's hilarious.

There are thousands of sheet cut OPC cards sitting in BGS 9.5 and 10 holders
I have about 25 of each player cut perfectly. The case was crazy. The only thing was Sakic had a print dot in the same spot on every copy, as did some other studs. Fleury and Leetch were nice though. They rejected my last sub of the Leetch Record Breaker, which is an error card, but pretty low in value.
 

card-treasury

New member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
0
Jaypers said:
card-treasury said:
1989-90 OPC hockey.

Did you measure them before sending them in? I've learned the hard way that you should always do so, especially for older cards.
Why would I measure them when I opened a sealed factory case?
 

Jaypers

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
49,739
Reaction score
2,714
Location
IL
card-treasury said:
Jaypers said:
[quote="card-treasury":cgez28pr]1989-90 OPC hockey.

Did you measure them before sending them in? I've learned the hard way that you should always do so, especially for older cards.
Why would I measure them when I opened a sealed factory case?[/quote:cgez28pr]

Factory miscuts happen all the time. Sometimes 3rd party grading services mistake miscuts for trimmed cards.
 

card-treasury

New member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
0
Jaypers said:
card-treasury said:
Jaypers said:
[quote="card-treasury":1d384yvk]1989-90 OPC hockey.

Did you measure them before sending them in? I've learned the hard way that you should always do so, especially for older cards.
Why would I measure them when I opened a sealed factory case?

Factory miscuts happen all the time. Sometimes 3rd party grading services mistake miscuts for trimmed cards.[/quote:1d384yvk]
I guess I have to elaborate, then.

Shucks, Iwas trying to avoid typing a lot since I'm preparing a BGS sub, and my cards are piled high all round my hands.

I bought the case sealed from Kruk cards for about 100 beans back in the mid-90's. All the cards are gorgeous. BGS has slabbed about 8 of my Leetch RCs, 10 of my Fleury RCs, and a coupe of others (ROY Vezina, etc.) from the case.

PSA has graded some as well.

I decided to go through the box once more last year when Leetch was announced as a HOF candidate.

I thought maybe the Record Breaker card (exlusive to the OPC set, and an uncorrected error of a diff. player's photo) would be worth grading. I sent them in and they came back as non-graded with evidence of trimming.

Same cards, same case, same cuts, same grading companies.
 

Jaypers

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
49,739
Reaction score
2,714
Location
IL
card-treasury said:
Same cards, same case, same cuts, same grading companies.

Different grader. Everything is subjective. Until robots do the job for them someday.

And remember, miscuts can occur within cases containing perfectly cut cards as well.

Here's my example - a couple of years ago, I sent in about 25 Maybin Chrome AFLACs to PSA. About 5 of them came back as "Evidence of trimming", while the rest got 9's and 10's.

After that, I promised myself to measure my cards every time.
 

card-treasury

New member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
0
Jaypers said:
card-treasury said:
Same cards, same case, same cuts, same grading companies.

Different grader. Everything is subjective. Until robots do the job for them someday.
How come the robots that give obvious 9's 9.5's and 10's (at PSA) never seem to grade my oders?

I'm actually happy with BGS. They grade my cards fairly, but the trimmed thing made me feel like someone accused me of stealing.
 

Jaypers

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
49,739
Reaction score
2,714
Location
IL
Mike - I added a little story of my own to my last post above.
 

G $MONEY$

New member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
14,156
Reaction score
1
Location
Calgary
89-90 OPC Hockey, well all 80s OPC Hockey is notorious for miscuts. I too had a Sakic RC rejected as trimmed, as well as a 88/89 Hull RC as trimmed. These were cards that i pulled when the packs first came out.
 

Members online

Top