joey12508
Well-known member
2013 topps tek, the chase for the rare card of your favorite player. more competition, topps just doesn't get it.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Sticks of gum in packs.
I just wish it was simple again. Going to happen? Not a chance in hell. But hey, I can wish.
2013 topps tek, the chase for the rare card of your favorite player. more competition, topps just doesn't get it.
Embedded media from this media site is no longer available
Sticks of gum in packs.
I just wish it was simple again. Going to happen? Not a chance in hell. But hey, I can wish.
Less parallel variations.......one refractor insert and maybe a 1/1 is enough. make serial numbers worth something again.
Card shops should be better and there needs to be more of them. The Internet has its place in the hobby, but nothing replaces the experience of going to a shop and talking about cards or sports with the shop owner and fellow collectors.
It needs rarity and chase.
Make the rare top end truly rare.
It needs a few sets that the public thinks they just aren't cool enough to have.
Donruss/Playoff/Leaf/Absolute...you get the idea![]()
Who cares? Someone who is in this to sell. I know people like to sell and prospect but this is a hobby. You can't be getting mad when it's not easy for you to sell.
As far as I'm concerned...I like Bowman and I hate it. About the only reason I like it is you get the chance to get cards of guys who never made the majors. I actually had a handful of cards of a guy I met and went to school with. I had him sign them for me. That was neat. But other than that aspect, and the cool photographs they use on the cards sometimes, Bowman in and of itself is useless as far as a collector standpoint. And if they are going to have Bowman cards, they need to either do away with the RC logo or consider the first year cards that come out to be RC's. Why the holy hell that has changed is beyond ridiculous. It's why I hate Baseball RC collecting now. I can buy all the RC logo cards I want for cheap, which is nice, but they aren't real rookies. So even them existing, let alone me having any, is downright weird. And it's also why I gravitate more towards collecting football and basketball rookies. Because those are real rookies. There is none of this "prospect insert" crap and then 2 years later they have an official RC. It would be one thing if this was just a personal pet peeve. But I have yet to hear even one good reason for this change.
Obviously they'll never get rid of Bowman. It's too much of a cash cow for Topps. So why not just work with MLB and get this fixed.
To do away with super rare and 1/1 items. The prices of packs to even have an attempt to get a nice card drive away the casual collector and kids as well.
This is a big part of it for me. I love shooting the bull with people in the shop and, along with making it more fun, gives me that added motivation that I need to stay in the hobby. True, I love going online and picking up cards that I wouldn't be able to get otherwise at the shops/shows around here but at times it just feels so mechanical.
To do away with super rare and 1/1 items. The prices of packs to even have an attempt to get a nice card drive away the casual collector and kids as well.
Wrapper redemptions were great in the 80s, All star sets, painters hats, even if i didn't get the cards I wanted I saved the wrappers for something else.
Less trying to out collect others and trying to get blood from a stone, instead working together to help each other. Yes there are some who are going to be idiots and try to "ching a ling" others, but a great example is The Team Collectors from Beckett now on Nimster's site.
The industry certainly cares. Topps and other companys simply cannot survive without this rapid exchange of cards from person to person. It fuels sales of sealed product that keeps them going.
Oh, and the licensing dollar issue won't get fixed until they can't find a buyer at their price. As far as MLBP is concerned, nothing is wrong.