Whats wrong with this picture

[cmnkb8]

 

[JoshHamilton]

Wierd thing is the auto looks like it was signed with a blue pen/marker (to me anyway). Wonder if the guy traced the facsimile auto :shock:

Oh my god you overanalyze **** way too much

 

[morgoth]

Well in the war for who has better auto authenticators PSA/DNA just scored 1 point.

I have seen PSA make this same mistake as well.

As far as Topps reprinting their cards, some of their best modern inserts are autographed reprint RC's of HOF's and upcoming HOF's.

In fact if they did put a atomic refractor version that was really auto'd into this set it would have been the best card in the whole set.

 

[ajbraves25]

Wierd thing is the auto looks like it was signed with a blue pen/marker (to me anyway). Wonder if the guy traced the facsimile auto :shock:

They all look like they are signed. The Pujols is an exact copy of the rookie ie the blue "looking" signature.

~AJ

 

[beefycheddar]

Well in the war for who has better auto authenticators PSA/DNA just scored 1 point.

I have seen PSA make this same mistake as well.

As far as Topps reprinting their cards, some of their best modern inserts are autographed reprint RC's of HOF's and upcoming HOF's.

In fact if they did put a atomic refractor version that was really auto'd into this set it would have been the best card in the whole set.

JSA doesn't review for the autograph grade unless it has a JSA marking on slab, so this has nothing to do with them.

 

[morgoth]

Well in the war for who has better auto authenticators PSA/DNA just scored 1 point.

I have seen PSA make this same mistake as well.

As far as Topps reprinting their cards, some of their best modern inserts are autographed reprint RC's of HOF's and upcoming HOF's.

In fact if they did put a atomic refractor version that was really auto'd into this set it would have been the best card in the whole set.

JSA doesn't review for the autograph grade unless it has a JSA marking on slab, so this has nothing to do with them.

I never mentioned JSA

 

[PeteD]

Wierd thing is the auto looks like it was signed with a blue pen/marker (to me anyway). Wonder if the guy traced the facsimile auto :shock:

They all look like thay are signed. The Pujols is an exact copy of the rookie ie the blue "looking" signature.

~AJ

See, that's all that had to be stated. Not everyone busted a kazillion cases of the stuff...sheesh :evil:

 

[beefycheddar]

Well in the war for who has better auto authenticators PSA/DNA just scored 1 point.

I have seen PSA make this same mistake as well.

As far as Topps reprinting their cards, some of their best modern inserts are autographed reprint RC's of HOF's and upcoming HOF's.

In fact if they did put a atomic refractor version that was really auto'd into this set it would have been the best card in the whole set.

JSA doesn't review for the autograph grade unless it has a JSA marking on slab, so this has nothing to do with them.

I never mentioned JSA

JSA does BGS autograph authentication so you actually did. BGS does not authenticate a certified autograph, and neither does PSA, so PSA/DNA and JSA really have nothing to do with this blunder.

 

[PeteD]

Was this REALLY neccesary? You seem to have forgotten the THEME of this site...or do you enjoy trolling ppl who aren't familiar with an product. Bet your reaction folder is full of memes from Reddit and 4 Chan...amirite?

 

[ThoseBackPages]

Well in the war for who has better auto authenticators PSA/DNA just scored 1 point.

I have seen PSA make this same mistake as well.

As far as Topps reprinting their cards, some of their best modern inserts are autographed reprint RC's of HOF's and upcoming HOF's.

In fact if they did put a atomic refractor version that was really auto'd into this set it would have been the best card in the whole set.

JSA doesn't review for the autograph grade unless it has a JSA marking on slab, so this has nothing to do with them.

I never mentioned JSA

JSA does BGS autograph authentication so you actually did. BGS does not authenticate a certified autograph, and neither does PSA, so PSA/DNA and JSA really have nothing to do with this blunder.

Then what does BGS do with that extra $2 per slab fee for autographed cards? lol

 

[Tomlinson21RB]

Well in the war for who has better auto authenticators PSA/DNA just scored 1 point.

I have seen PSA make this same mistake as well.

As far as Topps reprinting their cards, some of their best modern inserts are autographed reprint RC's of HOF's and upcoming HOF's.

In fact if they did put a atomic refractor version that was really auto'd into this set it would have been the best card in the whole set.

JSA doesn't review for the autograph grade unless it has a JSA marking on slab, so this has nothing to do with them.

I never mentioned JSA

JSA does BGS autograph authentication so you actually did. BGS does not authenticate a certified autograph, and neither does PSA, so PSA/DNA and JSA really have nothing to do with this blunder.

Then what does BGS do with that extra $2 per slab fee for autographed cards? lol

Tell you if the ink on the card has faded or is streaky.

 

[morgoth]

Well in the war for who has better auto authenticators PSA/DNA just scored 1 point.

I have seen PSA make this same mistake as well.

As far as Topps reprinting their cards, some of their best modern inserts are autographed reprint RC's of HOF's and upcoming HOF's.

In fact if they did put a atomic refractor version that was really auto'd into this set it would have been the best card in the whole set.

JSA doesn't review for the autograph grade unless it has a JSA marking on slab, so this has nothing to do with them.

I never mentioned JSA

JSA does BGS autograph authentication so you actually did. BGS does not authenticate a certified autograph, and neither does PSA, so PSA/DNA and JSA really have nothing to do with this blunder.

It is PSA's and BGS's job to know if a card has a real or facsimile auto on it, period end of story. Making excuses for them is not cool

 

[cmnkb8]

Was this REALLY nessesary? You seem to have forgotten the THEME of this site...or do you enjoy trolling ppl who aren't familiar with an product. Bet your reaction folder is full of memes from Reddit and 4 Chan...amirite?

Someone's got their ******* all in a ***. Relax...inhale...exhale.

And I wasn't replying specifically to your post.

 

[DeliciousBacon]

Does someone here actually own this card, or is this some kind of Photoshop joke?

 

[JoshHamilton]

Does someone here actually own this card, or is this some kind of Photoshop joke?

It's a tropical illusion

 

[Super Mario]

Does someone here actually own this card, or is this some kind of Photoshop joke?

It's a tropical illusion

 

[cwells46]

Perhaps they graded it on the third day?

 

[ajbraves25]

Does someone here actually own this card, or is this some kind of Photoshop joke?

Look at the flip. It looks real to me. I tweeted Chris Olds and his response was "It's happened before. PEOPLE make mistakes."

So who knows. I know he's not with BGS but is affiliated with Beckett.

~AJ

 

[cubsfan_2007]

Someone pulled it on Blowout, it was posted there, no photoshop lol

 

[beefycheddar]

He's not wearing an Angels uniform!