Why Why Why?

[nosterbor]

Man Oh Man Oh Man.

1993 Topps Finest Juan Gonzalez Refractor Auto Autograph Signed texas Rangers | eBay

Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for 1993 Topps Finest Juan Gonzalez Refractor Auto Autograph Signed texas Rangers at the best online prices at eBay! Free shipping for many products!

www.ebay.com

 

[finestkind]

Only $113.00 for 24 months.

 

[magicpapa]

 

[smapdi]

I'm missing something. Is it,"Why did the put a fake auto on this nice card?" (no idea if it's fake or not) or "Why are they asking $2600 for it?"

 

[nosterbor]

The auto is real. Why would you ruin a 1993 finest refractor with an autograph. Unless the card was bent in half or some other catastrophic flaw.

 

[thelesquad]

The auto is real. Why would you ruin a 1993 finest refractor with an autograph. Unless the card was bent in half or some other catastrophic flaw.

This same conversation was had last year in a Sandberg collector's group. Someone had him sign a 1993 Finest Refractor as well. Many collectors hated the idea, but a few loved it and someone actually bought it.

 

[mrmopar]

The auto is real. Why would you ruin a 1993 finest refractor with an autograph. Unless the card was bent in half or some other catastrophic flaw.

That, my friend, is in the eye of the beholder. I'd do the same thing, given the opportunity. There are almost 250 of those Juan Gone refractors, right? How many are signed? Probably fewer than a dozen, if even that many. I'd bet there are people out there willing to buy a card like that. I guess the question becomes, is there a Juan collector or fan willing to spend that much money on the card with signature?

I'd be willing to bet there are plenty of folks now who'd get Mantle to sign a 52 Topps without a second thought, when very few would take that "risk" when he was still alive. Unless it is pristine condition, I think an autograph only improves a vintage card. It remains to be seen what autographs will do to lower print run inserts and the likes when the current stars are dead and gone and there is no way to reproduce an item like that.

 

[mrmopar]

I should add that I have moved into a state with my collection that leaves me lacking interest if the item is not signed. This is especially true to items that were mass produced and easy to find. It's a little trickier with rare items, but I'll still say a signed rarity is better than an unsigned one, if the signature is quality and the item still looks great with a signature (sadly, some items don't look good regardless with a signature)

 

[JVHaste]

I recall seeing a few Crusades signed over the years, including a red for a prominent player. What it Ripken?

 

[magicpapa]

I recall seeing a few Crusades signed over the years, including a red for a prominent player. What it Ripken?

@Pinbreaker

 

[JVHaste]

@Pinbreaker
View attachment 316060

Wow! It definitely wasn't this one, so I guess there are multiple famous reds that are signed! Wonder what the value is on that card these days. . . .

 

[magicpapa]

i dont think thats real

 

[magicpapa]

This same conversation was had last year in a Sandberg collector's group. Someone had him sign a 1993 Finest Refractor as well. Many collectors hated the idea, but a few loved it and someone actually bought it.

View attachment 315993

seller has one for sale too, along with a few other players, plus a graded set, unsigned

1993 Topps Finest Ryne Sandberg Refractor Auto Autograph Signed Chicago Cubs | eBay

Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for 1993 Topps Finest Ryne Sandberg Refractor Auto Autograph Signed Chicago Cubs at the best online prices at eBay! Free shipping for many products!

www.ebay.com

griffey also

1993 Topps Finest Ken Griffey Jr Refractor Auto Seattle Mariners inscription HOF | eBay

Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for 1993 Topps Finest Ken Griffey Jr Refractor Auto Seattle Mariners inscription HOF at the best online prices at eBay! Free shipping for many products!

www.ebay.com

 

[thelesquad]

seller has one for sale too, along with a few other players, plus a graded set, unsigned

1993 Topps Finest Ryne Sandberg Refractor Auto Autograph Signed Chicago Cubs | eBay

Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for 1993 Topps Finest Ryne Sandberg Refractor Auto Autograph Signed Chicago Cubs at the best online prices at eBay! Free shipping for many products!

www.ebay.com

griffey also

1993 Topps Finest Ken Griffey Jr Refractor Auto Seattle Mariners inscription HOF | eBay

Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for 1993 Topps Finest Ken Griffey Jr Refractor Auto Seattle Mariners inscription HOF at the best online prices at eBay! Free shipping for many products!

www.ebay.com

That Ryno is gorgeous but way out of my price range.

 

[MrMet2.0]

That Ryno is gorgeous but way out of my price range.

$78 for 24 months with PayPal credit…lol


Sent from my iPhone using Freedom Card Board mobile app

 

[theplasticman]

This same conversation was had last year in a Sandberg collector's group. Someone had him sign a 1993 Finest Refractor as well. Many collectors hated the idea, but a few loved it and someone actually bought it.

View attachment 315993

That looks amazing with the gold ink

 

[jmc855]

The auto is real. Why would you ruin a 1993 finest refractor with an autograph. Unless the card was bent in half or some other catastrophic flaw.

As a player collector, I am and have been considering one of my 93 Finest refractors for a Clemens auto actually, so it's funny you mention it. I would do so because its a cool card to me, so I wouldn't feel I "ruined it", and it would be more unique than the boatload of 87/88 vintage junk wax cards that he's signed for nearly everyone on planet earth. I don't feel I ruined my PawSox TCMA rookie by having it signed, or the Fleer Update I'll likely have signed. To each our own, I guess.

 

[mrmopar]

I think another factor is that autograph collectors tend to see more value (either personal or monetary) in having nice things signed. its not always about money, but that is always present in the background too. I hate seeing junky reprint cards, especially cards that are flawed. Who gets a beater card signed? What is the point of that?

Anyway, like jmc855 said, I would get the TCMA or the 84 Fleer Traded card signed before I would have him sign a 1987 Topps, even before his 85 RCs, because they are just better cards made even that much better with a signature. There will always be more unsigned copies to buy than signed copies, if the signature is that unappealing.

I think the serious card collector who may only buys auto for a player collection or for the count (like I do for GU cards, for example) doesn't see the autograph as all that appealing necessarily, but the cards themselves are individual works of art. Not slamming anyone for the way they collect or what they value (unless you get beater cards signed, then I have to bash you!!), clearly it does come down to what appeals the most to an individual.

I will maintain my mindset though that if not already, signed "premium" cards will almost always eventually out value (monetarily at least) their unsigned counterparts with possibly the exception of the grading factor. However, even then if a card can still grade a 10 with a signature, it makes it all that more rare and unique and possibly even more valuable.

 

[thechuckday]

People like autos on cards for a variety of reasons. I already had a Kareem auto, but getting his 87-88 Fleer card meant something to me because I pulled it from a pack when Kaybee Toys had them on clearance for 49¢. It’s certainly wasn’t a card to get graded, but I did have BGS authenticate it since they were at the show. So it’s slabbed and I like it better than the more valuable auto card.