- Thread starter
- #1
rymflaherty
New member
- Aug 7, 2008
- 3,716
- 0
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5050721
Seeing as they already signed Larry Johnson, it doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense, especially since it is only a one year deal. Why wouldn't they have just signed Parker to team up with Portis and not even bother with Johnson?
Guess they plan on running the ball a lot in Washington this year.
Seeing as they already signed Larry Johnson, it doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense, especially since it is only a one year deal. Why wouldn't they have just signed Parker to team up with Portis and not even bother with Johnson?
Guess they plan on running the ball a lot in Washington this year.