Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Xfractor or Refractor...

Which looks better...


  • Total voters
    25

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

flightposite

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
2,999
Reaction score
0
Well, I was going to start a BC collection and can't flippin decide if I like the regular refractors or xfractors better. The regular are just so clean cut and nice, but xfractors just seem to pop so nice. Xfractors, aside from just being more rare, are also harder to find without the dreaded line, but I would like rarity to not have a part in your decision... Looks alone! Let me know what you think.

*Just a note, I like them both better than blue, so don't interject with that.
 

G $MONEY$

New member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
14,156
Reaction score
1
Location
Calgary
I like both, but on looks alone i like regular refractors a tad bit more.
 

P_Manning 18

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
6,121
Reaction score
0
Straight Xfractors are ugly.......

These on the other hand look really nice.... wish they'd do this more often.
af8e_1.jpg
 

hofautos

New member
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
6,678
Reaction score
0
I prefer to see the player, otherwise i would buy a kaleidoscope...
 

bikerider60

New member
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Messages
1,314
Reaction score
4
Location
Jackson, NJ
I like the early xfractor look 2001 - 2002 bowman chrome. Then they screwed them up ,and they got worse through the years......

01bcxcabrera.jpg

naxfwright.jpg

03bxyoukilis.jpg

06bcmx.jpg
 

Brewer Andy

Active member
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
9,634
Reaction score
21
I can't believe its that close. Xfractors are hideous
 

flightposite

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
2,999
Reaction score
0
Still very close. As I thought, this was going to be a tight race.
 

Bigfan5

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
0
It's a tough question but for sheer eye candy I'd go with the X as it's sort of the poor man's super. But, the lines are always the huge factor for me. With a refractor I'll pretty much get any one but with an X I really have to search before I settle on one. Even some of the ones I have that have high grades still have lines which can be a bother.

All that aside though, they really pop and if a ref and and X are side by side my eye always goes to the X.
 

muskiesfan

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
12,531
Reaction score
0
Location
Murfreesboro, TN
I am a huge fan of Xfractors. I think they look great. They remind me of the Atomic Refractors of the 90's. I saw go with the Xfractors all the way.



Joe
 

Mudcatsfan

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
2,845
Reaction score
2
flightposite said:
Well, I was going to start a BC collection and can't flippin decide if I like the regular refractors or xfractors better. The regular are just so clean cut and nice, but xfractors just seem to pop so nice. Xfractors, aside from just being more rare, are also harder to find without the dreaded line, but I would like rarity to not have a part in your decision... Looks alone! Let me know what you think.

*Just a note, I like them both better than blue, so don't interject with that.

It differs from year to year

2002 Chrome and Chrome draft autos look awesome

2002 chrome draft base set xfractors thru recently look awful with the lines.

2008 somehow looks better, they've changed something.
 

Philip J. Fry

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 9, 2008
Messages
5,999
Reaction score
997
Location
Ohio
01bcxcabrera.jpg

Now where I have seen those before?


97bbaref-1.jpg


Ah yes, good 'ol Atomics.


Anyhow, I'd go with regular refractors anyday.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top