yankees rangers game 4 thread !!

[jrinne]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

The ball landed at the back of the wall....he would have to be 9 feet tall to catch it

not true

 

[bouwob]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

What BS. I dont care if the first was a HR, review the damn thing in the playoffs. 2 in 1 inning.

 

[EricInCT]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

after this Washington is going to need to snort some lines :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[matty07]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

AJ is in the zone...Not worried yet

weren't you cheering for Texas?

yes meaning not worried that hes in the zone right now cause hes bound to lose it

 

[A_Pharis]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

You only seem to ONLY show up when the yanks are in the lead. Bandwagon much?

Sorry didnt realize there where rules. Any others you care to share? Or is that only available in the hater handbook?

Haha "hater", again? Wow, you really are that sad of a guy aren't you?

"I'm right, because you are a hater."

Great defense, kid.

 

[nyc3]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

[
Outplayed how many innings in the past 3 games? This series should already be over. Keep playing the "hater" card, since it's the only thing that helps you justify how much of a ****** Yankee fans can be (including and extremely evident by you).

Keep calling people names I am sure your family tells all their friends about how cool you are on the internet.

 

[pudge1760]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

What BS. I dont care if the first was a HR, review the damn thing in the playoffs. 2 in 1 inning.

That is what I do not understand. Why wasn't the first one reviewed??? Just does not make sense.

 

[vwnut13]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

looked foul, but that super magnified clossup looked like a little bit of deflection.

 

[A_Pharis]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

Sooooo calling people "haters" isn't calling names?

Haha, wow, guy.

Disappear back under the rock until next season, please.

 

[1995BBRefractorGuy]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

Anndddd... yes fan interference. Way to go schmuck fans. One guy even deliberately slapped his glove.

They did it so the haters have something to whine about for the next 15 years. Because the Jefferey Mayer HR is now a distant memory.

And can someone explain how trying to catch a ball is classless? I understand you are raging with anger but seriously class? HAHAh the haters are getting pretty lame at this point.

You seem to ONLY show up when the yanks are in the lead. Bandwagon much?

NYC3 did you not see that ********** middle finger dance after Cruz complained? Stay classy is right.

I can't believe Washington didn't go bananas on the first homer, do they not have a guy in the booth to tell them it was clearly interference?

 

[Krom]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

You only seem to ONLY show up when the yanks are in the lead. Bandwagon much?

Sorry didnt realize there where rules. Any others you care to share? Or is that only available in the hater handbook?

No rules. just an observation.

 

[Greg Cleveland]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

Even my 11-year old could see it was fan interference. he said, "He took the ball right out of his glove!" More fodder for talk radio tomorrow (and here, too.)

 

[matty07]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

The umps are just useless this year

 

[markakis8]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

I'm not sure why the 1st one wasn't reviewed. It was clearly fan interference.

 

[EricInCT]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

looked foul, but that super magnified clossup looked like a little bit of deflection.

Sober up and watch the reply dude.

 

[nyc3]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

Sooooo calling people "haters" isn't calling names?

Haha, wow, guy.

Disappear back under the rock until next season, please.

When all they do is jump in topic to say how they hate yes. Remember when the "razor" haters where frowned upon? ohh how soon the weak minded forget.

And I wont disappear now that I know it bothers you and your Kleenex fest grandpa.

 

[A_Pharis]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

NYC3 did you not see that ********** middle finger dance after Cruz complained? Stay classy is right.

They just showed a replay of the guy making gestures at Cruz, too, but superfans like NYC only see what they want to see to justify their attitudes.

 

[tpeichel]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

The ball landed at the back of the wall....he would have to be 9 feet tall to catch it

not true

He jumps and his glove is above the wall.
The guy reaches onto the field of play and hits the players glove.
The ball hits the top of the wall and goes over.

If there was ever a HR ball that was capable of being robbed, that was it.

Tough call for the ump, but obvious interference from the replay. Why wouldn't they review something like that?

 

[vwnut13]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

looked foul, but that super magnified clossup looked like a little bit of deflection.

Sober up and watch the reply dude.

The one with the little magnifying glass looked like it had a little "jerk" when it went past the pole.

However, as I said, I thought when it was hit it was foul.

Also, I didn't see where the fans were leaning over the wall. looked like hey were directly over the padding to me.

 

[PeteD]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

Phillie fan looks looks like an angel 'bout now huh.