yankees rangers game 4 thread !!

[A_Pharis]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

When all they do is jump in topic to say how they hate yes. Remember when the "razor" haters where frowned upon? ohh how soon the weak minded forget.

And I wont disappear now that I know it bothers you and your Kleenex fest grandpa.

Let me make it easy for you to understand.

You make a comment about me "calling names" even though it was done after you come in calling everyone haters. Despite your resolve, "haters" is a name that was called... and then you complain about being called a ****** -- which is quantifiable by evidence supported by your posting history.

So not only are you a ******, but you're an ignorant and hypocritical ******.

P.S. Whining about being called a name? Wtf, sandy ******?

 

[Canocollector#1]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

I'm not sure why the 1st one wasn't reviewed. It was clearly fan interference.

I was shocked, too. I think it was a "judgement call" and those you can not review. Not really sure why they didn't. Anyways I thought he clearly would not of caught it, but of course I am going to accused of being biased. Jmo

 

[markakis8]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

ok burnett is pumping 1st pitch fastballs down the middle, swing the bat

 

[matty07]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

The guy who interfered made a stupid dance and looked like a major ******. If I was Cruz I would of jump over the fence and not him out

 

[poppudaimadochi]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

I don't know the exact rule, so I have to ask: even if the player has no clear chance at catching the ball, can it still then be called fan interference?

 

[nyc3]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

Just rewatched the replay without the hater glasses on.

He did jump high enough

BUT

He was comming down when the ball hit the BACK of the wall which he couldnt reach.

His glove was hit by the fat guy ON the way down while the ball was already behind the wall on the way to the floor.

HR

 

[A_Pharis]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

Something tells me the upcoming days will show a decrease in post-per-day ratio by a certain someone after the Yanks hit the couch to watch the rest of the Postseason.

 

[matty07]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

They better be stealing all day on Burnett

 

[EricInCT]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

Just rewatched the replay without the hater glasses on.

He did jump high enough

BUT

He was comming down when the ball hit the BACK of the wall which he couldnt reach.

His glove was hit by the fat guy ON the way down while the ball was already behind the wall on the way to the floor.

HR

Spoken like someone with rose colored glasses

 

[jrinne]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

Just rewatched the replay without the hater glasses on.

He did jump high enough

BUT

He was comming down when the ball hit the BACK of the wall which he couldnt reach.

His glove was hit by the fat guy ON the way down while the ball was already behind the wall on the way to the floor.

HR

I disagree

 

[matty07]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

HERE WE GO BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[vwnut13]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

Can someone show me conclusive evidence that a fan reached OVER the wall, besides after the play was dead?

 

[markakis8]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

you gotta love that, squares to bunt and AJ beans him!

AJ is back!

 

[trademhigh]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

There's the Burnett we are familiar with.

Free runs anyone?

 

[A_Pharis]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

Annndddd there's the Burnett we all love.

 

[markakis8]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

Wow, Arod could've gone to second...

 

[jrinne]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

Can someone show me conclusive evidence that a fan reached OVER the wall, besides after the play was dead?

I really hope your joking

 

[markakis8]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

Can someone show me conclusive evidence that a fan reached OVER the wall, besides after the play was dead?

I really hope your joking

You will learn to not even bother with him/her...

 

[tpeichel]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

I don't know the exact rule, so I have to ask: even if the player has no clear chance at catching the ball, can it still then be called fan interference?

If a HR ball is ten rows deep and a fan reaches on the field of play and contacts a player, no interference. The key on the HR ball is did the fan reach over into the field of play and contact the players glove or was the glove over the fence when it made contact with the fan?

I'd make the arguement that a ball that hits the top of the fence in that situation is catchable, so reaching into the field of play and hitting the players glove would be interference.

 

[vwnut13]

Re: burnett in the 1st..

Can someone show me conclusive evidence that a fan reached OVER the wall, besides after the play was dead?

I really hope your joking

I never saw a fan reach over the padding. Remember, the wall is about 1.5" wide.