Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
ChasHawk said:Jeff Bagwell
Juan Gonzalez
Mark McGwire
Rafael Palmeiro
All are either suspected, admitted, or proven PED users...none of these 4 gets in.
Larkin was a better SS.mikefrank said:Larkin, which means Trammell SHOULD already be in. Morris has been building momentum, given the "weak" list this year, he may make it. Bagwell I think is another year out, at least.
ebechols said:Dale Murphy has always been one of my favorite players, and he is running out of ballot time.
ffgameman said:I would vote:
Bagwell
Larkin
McGwire
Palmeiro I am iffy on. 3000 hits and 500 home runs, but he flat-out lied to Congress before testing positive.
Um, no. Larkin and Trammell are virtually identical, with WARs of 66.8 and 68. Trammell has better stats/performance than all but 4 HOF shortstops (as does Larkin). Not dissing Larkin, he deserves it & will get it. But Trammell deserves it, too.elmalo said:Larkin was a better SS.mikefrank said:Larkin, which means Trammell SHOULD already be in. Morris has been building momentum, given the "weak" list this year, he may make it. Bagwell I think is another year out, at least.
Larkins defensively was better. That was my point. It isnt all about stats.mikefrank said:Um, no. Larkin and Trammell are virtually identical, with WARs of 66.8 and 68. Trammell has better stats/performance than all but 4 HOF shortstops (as does Larkin). Not dissing Larkin, he deserves it & will get it. But Trammell deserves it, too.elmalo said:Larkin was a better SS.mikefrank said:Larkin, which means Trammell SHOULD already be in. Morris has been building momentum, given the "weak" list this year, he may make it. Bagwell I think is another year out, at least.
RustyGreerFan said:Here's a biased perspective on why Edgar should be in. I was more impressed at the time it was published, but am still impressed:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/ABPub/ ... 344959.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm still astonished that Jack Morris is not already in. As a kid in the 80's I thought he was the best pitcher. He's the winningest pitcher of the 80's, he was a big part of Detroit's World Championship team, and he had one of the most memorable World Series pitching performances of all time. I know his stats toward the end hurt his numbers and I've heard he was a jerk, but when I think 80's pitchers I think of him over Roger and Nolan. Not that he was better, that's just who I think of first.
Nope. Trammell 4 Gold Gloves, Larkin 3 Gold Gloves. Again, not dissing Larkin (who was excellent defensively, too), Trammell was exceptional defensively with textbook form positioning, fielding, and throwing. Again it's not an either/or, both deserve to be in the HOF.elmalo said:Larkins defensively was better. That was my point. It isnt all about stats.mikefrank said:Um, no. Larkin and Trammell are virtually identical, with WARs of 66.8 and 68. Trammell has better stats/performance than all but 4 HOF shortstops (as does Larkin). Not dissing Larkin, he deserves it & will get it. But Trammell deserves it, too.elmalo said:Larkin was a better SS.mikefrank said:Larkin, which means Trammell SHOULD already be in. Morris has been building momentum, given the "weak" list this year, he may make it. Bagwell I think is another year out, at least.