- Thread starter
- #1
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
braden said:I wonder how smart it is to give Crawford a seven-year deal (which I assume he's getting). For someone whose two best skills are primarily based on speed, paying him oodles well into his 30s has at least a good chance of turning sour. Speed is usually the first thing to go, remember.
Lars said:Maybe he can evolves into a more complete hitter as he loses his speed - maybe not Albert Pujols, but certainly a guy who is capable of hitting at least .290 with 20-22 home runs and maybe 90 RBIS.
He can probably steal 15-20 bases a year, even if most his speed goes in his 30s.
baseballguy350 said:Lars said:Maybe he can evolves into a more complete hitter as he loses his speed - maybe not Albert Pujols, but certainly a guy who is capable of hitting at least .290 with 20-22 home runs and maybe 90 RBIS.
He can probably steal 15-20 bases a year, even if most his speed goes in his 30s.
I don't disagree, but what is a .290/20/90 slash worth?
That was my one hesitation about the Sox signing him. I'd be thrilled if they did, but I wonder about years 5-7.
braden said:I wonder how smart it is to give Crawford a seven-year deal (which I assume he's getting). For someone whose two best skills are primarily based on speed, paying him oodles well into his 30s has at least a good chance of turning sour. Speed is usually the first thing to go, remember.
cowboysrule48 said:The Red Sox have agreed to a seven-year, $142MM deal with Carl Crawford, according to Peter Abraham of the Boston Globe