Im not a fan of defensive metrics.
Because they don't help your argument or because they aren't reliable?
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Im not a fan of defensive metrics.
Because they don't help your argument or because they aren't reliable?
Defensive metrics are flawed.
Based on what? And regardless, who said anything about Ozzie Smith? You could compare almost any SS in thehistory of the game and they will fall short of Smith.your entitled to that opinion.
Jeter has cost his team nearly 150 runs in the field during his career.
Smith saved his team nearly 240 during his career.
Based on what? And regardless, who said anything about Ozzie Smith? You could compare almost any SS in thehistory of the game and they will fall short of Smith.
I think pretty much any defensive argument shows Jeter has been at best adequate as a SS. But considering his offensive value over that time from a prime defensive position I'm pretty sure most people take Jeter.your entitled to that opinion.
Jeter has cost his team nearly 150 runs in the field during his career.
Smith saved his team nearly 240 during his career.
Rose was a switch hitter, it gave him a great advantage especially later in his career.
I think any objective fan would agree with you. The discussion here isn't about his GG legacy but rather is he just good enough for the the near term to hold the position down to get to 4257.I think Jeter is a 1st ballot lock and wonderful offensive player. I just have a hard time swallowing the force fed "he's a great fielder, look at all his Gold Gloves," that fans want to include in his legacy.
I think any objective fan would agree with you. The discussion here isn't about his GG legacy but rather is he just good enough for the the near term to hold the position down to get to 4257.
Because they don't help your argument or because they aren't reliable?
Yes, but the "near term" is approx 5 years away (what 42yrs old?). SS is a premium defensive position and in the AL East you cant just give runs away because your SS can't get to balls....
Will you be supportive of Sabermetrics when I tell you that CC Sabathia had a higher WAR than Mr. MVP Justin Verlander last season?
3 things:
xRA or Level of Opposition could have contributed to a higher WAR for C.C. He faced the AL East much more than Verlander.
xRA_def or Adjusting for teams Defense. Team defense behind the pitcher will change the score as well.
PPFp or Custom Park Factor. Yankee Stadium=hitters park. Comerica=pitcher's park.
Therefore it is highly plausible that Sabathia had a higher WAR for the Yankees than Verlander had for the Tigers.
Edit: After looking up the WAR stats Verlander was listed as an 8.3 and CC as a 7.0 so I'm not sure what you are getting at anyway?
http://www.baseball-reference.com/awards/awards_2011.shtml#ALcya
Yes, but the "near term" is approx 5 years away (what 42yrs old?). SS is a premium defensive position and in the AL East you cant just give runs away because your SS can't get to balls....
CC Sabathia - 7.1 CC Sabathia » Statistics » Pitching | FanGraphs Baseball
Justin Verlander - 7.0 Justin Verlander » Statistics » Pitching | FanGraphs Baseball
But don't you see? Sabermetrics are so tell all that different people calculate them in different ways.
I think Sabathia had just as good a year last year as Verlander. So this doesnt surprise me at all.