jimmyjam1973
Active member
If you have to make an argument for any player, they shouldn't be in. It's the Hall of Fame, not the Hall of Good/Average.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
I know why I think he is not hall worthy......my quote was aimed at the poster taking a jab at the OP. Post that Pierre making the hall is joke but toss in a couple of stats......dont just post to post.
I understood where you were coming from, George - just used your quote as a segue into some stats and banter.
Rk Yrs From To
1 Ozzie Smith 14 1978 1994
2 Tony Gwynn 13 1984 1998
3 Bill Buckner 10 1973 1986
4 Pete Rose 10 1972 1983
5 Don Mattingly 9 1984 1994
6 Felix Millan 9 1968 1976
7 Juan Pierre 8 2001 2011
8 Bill Madlock 8 1975 1983
9 Larry Bowa 8 1975 1983
10 Luis Aparicio 8 1961 1973
Tim Raines was diagnosed with Lupus in his late 30s and missed nearly two seasons to the disease before he made a comeback. The effects of Lupus (constant tiring, sluggishness, etc.) affected his play for many years before and after the diagnosis, so comparing Raines to Pierre in their late 30s is foolish and ignorant.429 hits. That's how many Tim Raines had in his age 35+ years. I would suspect Pierre will see a similar decline...
Although obviously important, HOF isn't all about stats. Will voters think his contributions to the game, character, sportsmanship, etc put him over the top?
Tim Raines was diagnosed with Lupus in his late 30s and missed nearly two seasons to the disease before he made a comeback. The effects of Lupus (constant tiring, sluggishness, etc.) affected his play for many years before and after the diagnosis, so comparing Raines to Pierre in their late 30s is foolish and ignorant.
I'll fess up to ignorant as I didn't know Raines had Lupus. Not really foolish, since I didn't know. That said, wouldn't Raines' late 30s being affected by disease make his career stats look even better?
Even then, the rest of his statistics are far from HOF worthiness.
Just because someone sticks around long enough to reach 3000 hits while producing marginally everywhere else does not mean he is a HOF'er
How many top 10 finishes in MVP's did he have? How many times was he top 5 in batting, or RBI, or HR? How many times was he an All-Star? How many times did he have a high OPS?
Offense, Defense, etc...Those are all things voters take into account.
He's also pretty darn good at putting the ball in play, i.e. not striking out. Since 1961, here are the most qualified seasons for players with 15 times as many plate appearances as strikeouts:
Code:Rk Yrs From To 1 Ozzie Smith 14 1978 1994 2 Tony Gwynn 13 1984 1998 3 Bill Buckner 10 1973 1986 4 Pete Rose 10 1972 1983 5 Don Mattingly 9 1984 1994 6 Felix Millan 9 1968 1976 7 Juan Pierre 8 2001 2011 8 Bill Madlock 8 1975 1983 9 Larry Bowa 8 1975 1983 10 Luis Aparicio 8 1961 1973
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Play Index Tool Used
Generated 7/23/2012.
This doesn't make him HOF worthy, but it's still impressive.
Rk Yrs
1 Pete Rose 10
2 Steve Garvey 6
3 Vada Pinson 4
4 Jack Tobin 4
5 Shoeless Joe Jackson 4