Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

2011 Topps Debut: It's not bad enough...

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Bob Loblaw

Active member
Joined
Aug 21, 2008
Messages
11,216
Reaction score
15
Location
Bright House Field
...that they chopped up Aflacs of minor leaguers in 2010 and framed them to the ::facepalm:: of collectors everywhere.....

Scan10186.jpg

(yes these are mine. No, I don't want them. I hate these cards....)



Then they used at least one subject from the 2010 set and recycled the same stupid AFLAC cuts in 2011.


$(KGrHqUOKjEE3Juq!5IdBN6ElZnfog~~0_12.jpg


::facepalm:: ::facepalm:: ::facepalm:: ::facepalm:: ::facepalm:: ::facepalm:: ::facepalm:: ::facepalm::
 

Ty Hope

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
10,619
Reaction score
2
I really don't understand what they are trying to achieve with those cards. I mean, ugly doesn't come close to describing how bad they look. Who the hell collects those?
 

ch2423

New member
Joined
Jan 3, 2011
Messages
179
Reaction score
0
Location
NE Ohio
It's cards like those that explain why the 90's inserts thread is on version 3. My only question is if Topps actually thought these were a good idea or if they knew they were crap and didn't care. Either way, ::facepalm::
 

RL24

New member
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
3,469
Reaction score
5
Location
Colorado Springs, CO
Destinhood is one of the coolest words that's not in the English language. It should be though. It is the state of fulfilling ones intended purpose. Pretty awesome.
 

Mudcatsfan

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
2,845
Reaction score
2
RL24 said:
Destinhood is one of the coolest words that's not in the English language. It should be though. It is the state of fulfilling ones intended purpose. Pretty awesome.

Witty, I like it :)
 

MGiuseffi

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
388
Reaction score
0
They are "extra" hits, not one of the two autos you are guaranteed per box... So, why are these such a bad thing?
 

Bob Loblaw

Active member
Joined
Aug 21, 2008
Messages
11,216
Reaction score
15
Location
Bright House Field
MGiuseffi said:
They are "extra" hits, not one of the two autos you are guaranteed per box... So, why are these such a bad thing?

Would you rather have an autograph on an AFLAC card

or

a sliver of the aflac card, with the autograph, framed into another card? Cardabalism.
 

uniquebaseballcards

New member
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
6,783
Reaction score
0
Jeff N. said:
MGiuseffi said:
They are "extra" hits, not one of the two autos you are guaranteed per box... So, why are these such a bad thing?

Would you rather have an autograph on an AFLAC card

or

a sliver of the aflac card, with the autograph, framed into another card? Cardabalism.

So, which year would you say those cards are from?

I don't think these look bad at all:
Scan10186.jpg
 

Bob Loblaw

Active member
Joined
Aug 21, 2008
Messages
11,216
Reaction score
15
Location
Bright House Field
uniquebaseballcards said:
Jeff N. said:
MGiuseffi said:
They are "extra" hits, not one of the two autos you are guaranteed per box... So, why are these such a bad thing?

Would you rather have an autograph on an AFLAC card

or

a sliver of the aflac card, with the autograph, framed into another card? Cardabalism.

So, which year would you say those cards are from?

I don't think these look bad at all:
Scan10186.jpg


THe majority of the collecting world disagrees, but to each his own.

THey're 2010 Pro Debut cards with 2007 AFLAC slivers inserted.
 

MGiuseffi

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
388
Reaction score
0
Jeff N. said:
MGiuseffi said:
They are "extra" hits, not one of the two autos you are guaranteed per box... So, why are these such a bad thing?

Would you rather have an autograph on an AFLAC card

or

a sliver of the aflac card, with the autograph, framed into another card? Cardabalism.

I'd prefer the AFLAC for sure, but in a topps product they cannot be inserted and this is a minor league release... Those are the reasons they are used this way. They perhaps could have inserted them, as is, in a Bowman release....
 

schmidtfan20

Active member
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
6,444
Reaction score
0
This is just as bad as UD chopping up a 10 dollar autograph card, putting it into a cut card, numberding it low, calling
it a case hit and turning it into an 80 dollar card.

Kevin
 

aaron41984

New member
Joined
Jun 22, 2009
Messages
1,931
Reaction score
0
schmidtfan20 said:
This is just as bad as UD chopping up a 10 dollar autograph card, putting it into a cut card, numberding it low, calling
it a case hit and turning it into an 80 dollar card.

Kevin

What? Topps is turning an $80 card into a $10 card. It's the complete opposite.
 

JzWand

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2009
Messages
1,328
Reaction score
0
Location
Burlington Ontario Canada
The funny thing is I don't even think you can chalk it up to being lazy since IMO it actually takes up more resources to cut up an already existing card and frame it nicely onto another card.

Its more of a stupid idea IMO and a waste of topps resources!

Better off keeping the aflac auto, stamping something like debut graphs on the front and your done.
 

Members online

Top