jswaykos
New member
I don't know, Topps ended the contest pretty quickly last year, too. I doubt many people buy this product trying to break the code, anyway. Those that are serious about it already pre-order by the case.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Which card numbers are those four?onenineeightsix said:I think it has to do with the pictures on the outside edges of the Hobby Boxes.
There is a Photo of a Turkey, a Flaming Torch, an Astronomer and a Ship.
There is in the set: A champion Turkey-Caller, A Fire-Eater, Gallileo, And Ship Captain Sig Hansen.
This HAS TO HAVE some correlation. I originally pointed out that Jeter has no card and I still think this is th emost critical piece of information, how to use it though is beyond me.
It does start to look like the code starts from unscrambling all of the names matching the CS'snkbeachboy said:CS8: intense, passionate, dedicated (_______ #__)
Stuart Scott 144 ?
CS9: energetic, optimistic, committed to others (_______ #__)
Regis 277 ?
CS11: two sides: one shy, one dynamic (_______ #__)
Laipply 95 ?
mnvikingstwins said:It does start to look like the code starts from unscrambling all of the names matching the CS'snkbeachboy said:CS8: intense, passionate, dedicated (_______ #__)
Stuart Scott 144 ?
CS9: energetic, optimistic, committed to others (_______ #__)
Regis 277 ?
CS11: two sides: one shy, one dynamic (_______ #__)
Laipply 95 ?
Maybe there are 2 people that go in each characteristic, we need to get them order by birthdays, and somehow use the birthdays of the base cards that fall in the signs, and take every so many words/lettersFootsteps said:mnvikingstwins said:It does start to look like the code starts from unscrambling all of the names matching the CS'snkbeachboy said:CS8: intense, passionate, dedicated (_______ #__)
Stuart Scott 144 ?
CS9: energetic, optimistic, committed to others (_______ #__)
Regis 277 ?
CS11: two sides: one shy, one dynamic (_______ #__)
Laipply 95 ?
Hmm...good point. Care to elaborate?
To nkbeachboy and the others trying to fill in this puzzle - do you think we should interpret these literally or more "qualitatively"/looking at the general idea? This is the debate I have been having this afternoon.
I'm trying to think one step ahead to see "what is next." After we get into the code, I'm trying to predict what the next process would be. The last few years' codes were multi-layered.