fengzhang
New member
LLWesMan said:fengzhang said:lisu said:fengzhang said:lisu said:Here's what I think....
I think that all these superstars who have made a ton of money using PED's should pay back half of their salaries to their teams. Besides that, I don't care.
I'm sure the Giants have already benefited from Bonds' PED use in the form of higher attendance, a trip to the World Series, and more excitement about Giants baseball. Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to get away with putting a lineup of Jose Cruz Jr., Shawn Dunston, JT Snow, Benito Santiago on the field.
Hey, no dissing JT Snow! That was one of the highest attended games for the Giants in 2008 when he retired!
The chicks always like JT Snow more than the male fans :lol:
But, let's face it, Bonds carried the lineup in the 2000-2004 years. Even his walks were helpful because they totally changed the complexion of the game. He created 20 runs for every 27 outs he made in 2004. The next highest in the league was Albert Pujols at...10. In other words, the difference b/w Bonds and Pujols in 2004 was bigger than the difference b/w Pujols and me.
Without Bonds, that lineup would've resembled last year's lineup which had the fewest HR's hit by a team since the 1993 expansion Marlins. That's pretty (un)impressive.
Some guy named Kent was pretty good too...
Not a huge Kent fan, especially in the later years. He wasn't nearly as good as early in his Giants career. I think he had a season where he only hit .250 with RISP and still got over 100 RBI's because Bonds got on 60% of the time in front of him.