Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Adenhart killer gets 51 yrs to life.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

TomMurry

New member
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
6,776
Reaction score
0
Location
Eastern PA
Sweetness said:
GarkoCollector said:
Sweetness said:
GarkoCollector said:
Sweetness said:
51 years is a bit much.

How do you figure?
15-life for each count (3)
6 years for Repeat DUI, LSHR

Those all add up when you kill 3 people

How many years did Stallworth serve for killing someone?

Its been said already, but since you're late to the party...
Theres LOTS of differences between the 2 situations, but primarily, Gallo was over 3x the legal limit, got into a car drunk and then hit a car killing 3 people. Stallworth was barely over the limit, had woken up and while driving, someone ran ILLEGALLY into the street where Stallworth hit them.

2 completely different sets of circumstances, but I'm sure you dont care about all that since it doesnt uphold your point.

Defending Donte Stallworth by making it the victim's fault, nice. It's called J-Walking, or crossing the street. Bottom line, Donte was drunk and killed someone.

Donte got a slap on the wrist b/c of his fame and Gallo got the book thrown at him b/c his victim was famous. It's not right that the law is not applied equally across the board. If Donte get's 30 days than Gallo should get 90 days. Gallo got 15 years per victim so Donte should've got 15 years. It's sad how many responses in this thread defend Stallworth but advocate throwing the book at Gallo.

1-Donte was not drunk. There is a difference between being over the legal limit and being drunk.
2-The person jaywalking was breaking the law as well.
3-You seem awfully sensitive to this...you must have someone close killed by a drunk driver and its clouding your judgement
Again, circumstances between the 2 are totally different
 

JoshHamilton

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
12,205
Reaction score
320
GarkoCollector said:
Sweetness said:
GarkoCollector said:
Sweetness said:
51 years is a bit much.

How do you figure?
15-life for each count (3)
6 years for Repeat DUI, LSHR

Those all add up when you kill 3 people

How many years did Stallworth serve for killing someone?

Its been said already, but since you're late to the party...
Theres LOTS of differences between the 2 situations, but primarily, Gallo was over 3x the legal limit, got into a car drunk and then hit a car killing 3 people. Stallworth was barely over the limit, had woken up and while driving, someone ran ILLEGALLY into the street where Stallworth hit them.

2 completely different sets of circumstances, but I'm sure you dont care about all that since it doesnt uphold your point.

Don't bother. Neither one of them apparently have the reading comprehension or intelligence to understand what you or lisu are saying

This thread is about Nick Adenhart. If you want to bitch about Donte Stallworth, go to the damn football or general boards and start a thread there
 

nosterbor

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
6,383
Reaction score
669
Location
Sunny Florida
lisu said:
sportscardtheory said:
lisu said:
sportscardtheory said:
I love watching people make excuses for celebrities while leaving regular people to lie under the bus while spitting on them.

again - reading comprehension on your part is poor. We're not making excuses for Stallworth. He at least didn't flee the crime scene (Gallo did which added to the years of his sentence). He pleaded guilty (Gallo pleaded not guilty). He made a serious mistake in driving when he was still over the DUI limit, but his crime was not as bad as Gallo's (who ran a red light and was seriously intoxicated) and his sentence was more lenient because of that. Also, he immediately accepted responsibility, paid for his mistake (financially) and accepted his NFL punishment with no complaints. I bet you that any normal American who can afford a lawyer would have had a similar sentence given the circumstances.

You are comparing less than a year in jail to 51-to-life for the same outcome of a crime. They both made the EXACT same error in judgment and a life and/or lives were lost. Plus you keep leaving out the many other times a celebrity has killed someone while driving drunk and gotten-off with a slap on the wrist. Yeah, there were different circumstances with these cases, but not less than year compared to 51-to-life differences. You have made excuse after excuse for Saint Stallworth and treat this other guy like he's an evil minion for doing the VERY SAME THING, DRINKING WHILE DRINKING AND KILLING SOMEONE. If Stallworth was the one who was killed by a drunk driver in the very same way, you WOULD be here crying that less than a year in prison was absurd and that he should be put-away for much longer. I would bet my collection on it.

It's not the same outcome. Gallo killed 3 people and put another guy into the hospital for a long time to recover for his injuries. Stallworth hit a pedestrian who may or may not have been jaywalking. Gallo was more than likely stumbling down drunk with his 0.25+ DUI and chose to drive while clearly intoxicated, while Stallworth had just woken up from drinking the night before and was just barely over the limit.

This is basic - Gallo didn't just get convicted with DUI manslaughter. He got convicted of MURDER because he has done it before. He was also convicted with felony Hit and Run. He killed 2 young people, one of who happened to be a baseball player. I would have the same opinion of him if he had killed a car full of college students. I have no interest in Stallworth except from what I have read and comprehended with my own brain.
sooooooo he just BARELY KILLED someone!
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Top