beefycheddar
Super Moderator
- Aug 7, 2008
- 8,055
- 0
Warren of Oz said:As a cardshop owner for some 20 years I have always taken a stance against inlicensed card issues. My primary issue with them is that they never seem to hold any value. I'm going back a few decades to things like Classic & Signature Rookies etc. I only sell licensed card issues in my shop. No Press Pass, no Sage & no Razor. I think the hobby as a whole will determine the future of the Razor line.
I haven't searched online to see how the singles are doing pricewise because of the Holiday rush going on. Have the big names been yeilding the big bucks? Let's face it, if the return is scant the future will be bleak. Any big sales reported?
Happy Holidays Everyone!
But as a card shop owner why would you limit what you sell? I honestly don't understand your stance at all. If this was 1988 and the MLB was giving out licenses again how vastly different would everyone's opinion of Razor be if their players had the logo of the team they were drafted by on them? I have both the Wieters EEE and the Wieters from Razor, and for my own PC I think I will keep the Razor one and if I ever sell or trade one it would be the EEE. I just don't like the EEE design. I love Donruss products, if his EEE looked like threads then I would have to debate some, but the on card aspect vs EEE/Threads I think really separates the two. For Razor exclusives that are in USA it's a much closer competition. I do think the USA On Cards right now are potentially the nicest looking cards of those players. But we do not know print runs at all on those cards, so it is tough to say how strongly you can feel about them.
I like the fire that Razor lit under Topps ass. If you don't think it did, you are insane. Look at some of the people I talk to and have talked to before, it definitely got Topps motivated and gave us one of the best Bowman Products in a while.