Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Based on #'s alone would Miggy still be the MVP

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

mlbsalltimegreats

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
6,772
Reaction score
3
Yes even if he did not win the Triple Crown he would have won it. The Voters spoke volumes and Cabrera Demolished Trout in the Voting 22-6 /thread
 

sportscardtheory

Active member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
8,461
Reaction score
2
Location
Buffalo, New York
MVP stands for Most Valuable Player, not Best Player in so and so League. That makes it a subjective award. And that is why Cabrera won. Of course he's not the best overall player in the A.L., but he was voted as being the most helpful in his team's success. The end.
 

George_Calfas

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
36,264
Reaction score
31
Location
Urbana
There was a substantial difference in runs scored. Trout scored 20 MORE runs in 20 FEWER games than Cabrera.

God forbid that a lead off man were to get on base so he could be driven in by the cleanup hitters. Who drives in the cleanup hitter when the back end of the lineup decreases in hitting potential.
 

hive17

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
21,426
Reaction score
24
If you want the award to go to the guy with the highest WAR, eliminate voting; otherwise, arguing against how baseball writers "feel" and voted is pointless...
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top