BowmanChromeAddict
New member
LLWesMan said:BowmanChromeAddict said:LLWesMan said:mredsox89 said:ballerskrip said:[quote="Mudcatsfan":xtxpbc64][quote="BowmanChromeAddict":xtxpbc64][quote="kentuckyderby":xtxpbc64]I appreciate the handful of names that were submitted to my question about which players were missing from the checklist that made this checklist so poor in some people's minds.
I agree that some of those would have been nice
I also accept the fact that not every single stud can make the checklist
Some cried brutal checklist last year and what we saw was one of the best ever in BDP history. There is some really nice potential in that list of autos
Why not an A+++ checklist??? There must be some reason why (maybe money...actually probably money (Strasburg, Ackley, Tate) although there are some odd-ball/different reasons why some don't agree to card contracts ---- ie wasn't there a top prospect last year who refused to be a Razor exclusive due to his childhood dream to have a Topps card)
Other than the Chrome autos, the base checklist in last year's BDP was pretty awful as I recall. Chrome Autos alone can't make it the "best ever in BDP history".
---yep.
Last years non-auto checklist is still one of the worst ever. Porcello, and dassit
Agreed, but look at what a strong base checklist did for 2007 BCDP. Wouldn't you rather have a strong autograph checklist?
I don't think that was his point. For a product to be in the "best ever" category, it has to have both. A set can survive on a monster auto list, not on a monster base set. But it can't be the best without both
Actually for it to be "best ever" it just has to be better than all of the other releases for that set. I'd say 08 is right there with 05.[/quote:xtxpbc64]
Are we evaluating as of today? Are we evaluating at 1 month after original release? That changes a lot.[/quote:xtxpbc64]
Over the duration of the product. I'll contend that 08 has been at or above release cost since release - most of the time above, all while the economy crumbled. 07 held for some time as well, but has seen a precipitous drop in the last year. I doubt many will argue they would take a case of 06 or 07 over a case of 08. I'd take a case of 09 ahead of 06 or 07.[/quote:xtxpbc64]
You would now, but would you 1 month after release? 3 months after release? I contend that you would not. I don't think its fair to evaluate a prospect product over the long haul. 02 BDP was a behemoth...but you're throwing it away now because there's very little left of value or potential 7 years later. If you're going to fairly evaluate a product pick a point equidistant from the original release and judge it from that point. It puts everything into perspective fairly.