Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Better career (projected) - Trout vs Lawrie

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

scotty21690

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
16,150
Reaction score
0
Lars said:
Mike Trout - he could be a .300, 30, 100, 50 SB, .400 on-base, .500 slugging guy in his prime - basically your prototypical superstar talent if he's healthy.
Dude, can you name any player who has even done that in one season besides Bonds? (Who only did it once)

Some of these predictions make me want to punch little babies.
 

Keyser Soze

New member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
3,262
Reaction score
0
Location
The Woodlands, TX
scotty21690 said:
Keyser Soze said:
I don't mean this to be disrespectful to anyone, but I pick Trout, and think that in 5 or 6 years it will be laughable that some chose Lawrie over him
I think it's laughable that you can predict the future.

Don't get your feelings all hurt because I disagreed with you, he ASKED for an OPINION that involved a prediction of their futures. Good lord
 

braden

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
2,536
Reaction score
0
It's funny that Lawrie was billed as being anywhere from a butcher to barely passable at defense. It's only been a month but he has been phenomenal. Putting on a clinic today especially.
 

scotty21690

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
16,150
Reaction score
0
Keyser Soze said:
scotty21690 said:
[quote="Keyser Soze":ga1h0kfu]I don't mean this to be disrespectful to anyone, but I pick Trout, and think that in 5 or 6 years it will be laughable that some chose Lawrie over him
I think it's laughable that you can predict the future.

Don't get your feelings all hurt because I disagreed with you, he ASKED for an OPINION that involved a prediction of their futures. Good lord[/quote:ga1h0kfu]
Yes, my feelings are so hurt. ::facepalm::
 

PujolsCollector

Active member
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Messages
4,104
Reaction score
1
Location
St.Louis
Keyser Soze said:
I don't mean this to be disrespectful to anyone, but I pick Trout, and think that in 5 or 6 years it will be laughable that some chose Lawrie over him
Thata way Nosetradameus.......always thinking ahead.



Im only kidding because of the comments that followed after this post.
 

Lars

Active member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
1,269
Reaction score
0
Take a chill pill dude.
:lol:

I was thinking more along the lines of Eric Davis in his prime though if Trout is all he is cracked up to be - I don't see those lofty numbers being hard to reach on a yearly basis.

scotty21690 said:
Lars said:
Mike Trout - he could be a .300, 30, 100, 50 SB, .400 on-base, .500 slugging guy in his prime - basically your prototypical superstar talent if he's healthy.
Dude, can you name any player who has even done that in one season besides Bonds? (Who only did it once)

Some of these predictions make me want to punch little babies.
 

drabek4

New member
Joined
Apr 5, 2011
Messages
177
Reaction score
0
It's lawrie and it's not close, did you see the 49 inch verticle jump into home plate after the walk off shot?
 

jcmint

Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
5,677
Reaction score
2
Ill go with trout. True five tool talent is tough to find. His speed now is game changing. His defense is already above.avg. if he hits and the power comes thru he can be a superstar. No slight to lawrie he looks legit.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top