Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Big things going down in the world of baseball products

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Status
Not open for further replies.

cgilmo

Well-known member
Administrator
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
37,212
Reaction score
35
Location
Alpharetta, Georgia, United States
BowmanChromeAddict said:
Am I the only one that doesn't care if UD financed Razor? The Razor contracts are still binding. The product still exists and could continue to exist. Why does it matter who financed it?


I do think it's fair to point out that Jeff Novell got roasted for this allegation and if it turns out he was right, there should be a line of people apologizing.


That dosen't change that it was a conspiracy theory at the time.
 

Jaypers

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
49,750
Reaction score
2,729
Location
IL
cgilmo said:
I just got off the phone with Brian.


He issued two points to me.


1. No deal with a player has been compromised, his contracts are valid.

2. Razor is not selling licensing contracts for any of their exclusives.

He didn't happen to mention if Razor will continue to pursue exclusive contracts with the class of 2009, did he?
 

hofmichael

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
3,811
Reaction score
0
Location
Albany,NY
cgilmo said:
I just got off the phone with Brian.


He issued two points to me.


1. No deal with a player has been compromised, his contracts are valid.

2. Razor is not selling licensing contracts for any of their exclusives.

So you still bite on every word this guy says?You told us all we were full **** when we said Upper Deck backed Razor because Brian said it wasn't true.Now it looks like it s very true.I don't think Brian can spin this one.A damn shame to because,Razor, if done right could have been a good thing for the hobby.I for one didn't trust him then and don't trust him now.

His Ebay distribution method is no different than when UD would print tons of extra Griffey Rookies and sell them hand to hand.
 

miguelcabrera

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
11,381
Reaction score
0
Location
YOU KNOW
These guys who are backing razor are simply doing it to protect their asses. They can say "I like what their doing" all they want, but they are just trying to protect their investments. People are going to lose money on this and these guys are trying (albeit unsucessfully) to protect them somewhat.
 

cgilmo

Well-known member
Administrator
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
37,212
Reaction score
35
Location
Alpharetta, Georgia, United States
hofmichael said:
cgilmo said:
I just got off the phone with Brian.


He issued two points to me.


1. No deal with a player has been compromised, his contracts are valid.

2. Razor is not selling licensing contracts for any of their exclusives.

So you still bite on every word this guy says?You told us all we were full shat when we said Upper Deck backed Razor because Brian said it wasn't true.Now it looks like it s very true.I don't think Brian can spin this one.A damn shame to because,Razor, if done right could have been a good thing for the hobby.I for one didn't trust him then and don't trust him now.

His Ebay distribution method is no different than when UD would print tons of extra Griffey Rookies and sell them hand to hand.


hahahahah


no, that is way off.


in the ebay distribution method there are a set number of cards available.
 

mredsox89

New member
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
8,724
Reaction score
0
Location
Miami/Boston
cgilmo said:
hofmichael said:
cgilmo said:
I just got off the phone with Brian.


He issued two points to me.


1. No deal with a player has been compromised, his contracts are valid.

2. Razor is not selling licensing contracts for any of their exclusives.

So you still bite on every word this guy says?You told us all we were full shat when we said Upper Deck backed Razor because Brian said it wasn't true.Now it looks like it s very true.I don't think Brian can spin this one.A damn shame to because,Razor, if done right could have been a good thing for the hobby.I for one didn't trust him then and don't trust him now.

His Ebay distribution method is no different than when UD would print tons of extra Griffey Rookies and sell them hand to hand.


hahahahah


no, that is way off.


in the ebay distribution method there are a set number of cards available.

There are a set number available and they were not available any other way.
 

Crash Davis

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
685
Reaction score
0
Jaypers said:
Here's something for everyone to consider.

If Razor is financed by UD, then why did their USA product suddenly go high-end? Seems as though that would be counterproductive to Razor's agenda.

And if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle.

According to the letter we all read, which was apparently sent by someone high-up at the MLBPA, stated that the owner and CEO of Upper Deck, Richard McWilliams (or McWilliam...whichever) ADMITTED to financing Razor and having defacto control over the company.
 

Dpanthers14

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
3,711
Reaction score
8
Location
Colorado
cgilmo said:
Dpanthers14 said:
first we have A-Fraud and now we have BG-Fraud. whats next ::facepalm::


example of fraud please?


perhaps you need a dictionary


Well by him being fraud as a person not what he did. How many times did he denies that he had no ties with UD? I respect honest people not liers you don't come on a message board and fill it full of lies and expect people to still buy your product.
 

ryanhoward06

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
2,046
Reaction score
0
miguelcabrera said:
These guys who are backing razor are simply doing it to protect their asses. They can say "I like what their doing" all they want, but they are just trying to protect their investments. People are going to lose money on this and these guys are trying (albeit unsucessfully) to protect them somewhat.

You forget to change your user ID?
 

hofmichael

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
3,811
Reaction score
0
Location
Albany,NY
cgilmo said:
hofmichael said:
cgilmo said:
I just got off the phone with Brian.


He issued two points to me.


1. No deal with a player has been compromised, his contracts are valid.

2. Razor is not selling licensing contracts for any of their exclusives.

So you still bite on every word this guy says?You told us all we were full shat when we said Upper Deck backed Razor because Brian said it wasn't true.Now it looks like it s very true.I don't think Brian can spin this one.A damn shame to because,Razor, if done right could have been a good thing for the hobby.I for one didn't trust him then and don't trust him now.

His Ebay distribution method is no different than when UD would print tons of extra Griffey Rookies and sell them hand to hand.


hahahahah


no, that is way off.


in the ebay distribution method there are a set number of cards available.

Sure there are.The base were not numbered.They were also supposed to be destroyed after the initial offering but they are going to the Pit.
 

mredsox89

New member
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
8,724
Reaction score
0
Location
Miami/Boston
hofmichael said:
cgilmo said:
hofmichael said:
cgilmo said:
I just got off the phone with Brian.


He issued two points to me.


1. No deal with a player has been compromised, his contracts are valid.

2. Razor is not selling licensing contracts for any of their exclusives.

So you still bite on every word this guy says?You told us all we were full shat when we said Upper Deck backed Razor because Brian said it wasn't true.Now it looks like it s very true.I don't think Brian can spin this one.A damn shame to because,Razor, if done right could have been a good thing for the hobby.I for one didn't trust him then and don't trust him now.

His Ebay distribution method is no different than when UD would print tons of extra Griffey Rookies and sell them hand to hand.


hahahahah


no, that is way off.


in the ebay distribution method there are a set number of cards available.

Sure there are.The base were not numbered.They were also supposed to be destroyed after the initial offering but they are going to the Pit.

Not at all. Thepit bought a specific number of them when they were available on ebay for the price everyone else paid. What were not sold will be destroyed.

Edit: Could some not be destroyed, of course. Could Razor have given more to thepit than the specific quantity they purchased during the 30 day period, of course.

And I have no financial interest aside from my player collection so i don't really care financially what happens to razor products. I want them to succeed but im losing confidence
 

Jaypers

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
49,750
Reaction score
2,729
Location
IL
Crash Davis said:
Jaypers said:
Here's something for everyone to consider.

If Razor is financed by UD, then why did their USA product suddenly go high-end? Seems as though that would be counterproductive to Razor's agenda.

And if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle.

According to the letter we all read, which was apparently sent by someone high-up at the MLBPA, stated that the owner and CEO of Upper Deck, Richard McWilliams (or McWilliam...whichever) ADMITTED to financing Razor and having defacto control over the company.

Wow. I had no idea that's what it said.

When you're ready to come down off your condescending high horse, this "little guy" would appreciate it.

I wish I could say I was shocked that you posted in this thread.
 

flightposite

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
2,999
Reaction score
0
cgilmo said:
Crash Davis said:
cgilmo said:
the story is out there


I decided not to print it because the letter is very misleading



wax heaven decided to print it.


http://completist.wordpress.com/2009/05 ... eck-razor/

Why do you consider the letter to be "very misleading?"

Thanks


If defacto control exists, then the people at UD aren't very smart.

They muddied up future razor products with their USA set. If you control something, you don't compete with it.


Plus, I am sure that the financial ties were to edgeman, and not razor. Read, the information is out there.

You seem sort of split here.

To me, it's easy, if the memo is true... which, why wouldn't it be... UD ran Razor as they had de facto control.

I think worrying about the financing is immaterial. As either the memo is false and none of this is true or it is and UD is running the show.

There was smoke, then there was fire, now it's just ablaze and people still refuse to believe anything is going on. Wow.
 

All The Hype

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
10,250
Reaction score
0
Location
Indianapolis
cgilmo said:
Crash Davis said:
cgilmo said:
the story is out there


I decided not to print it because the letter is very misleading



wax heaven decided to print it.


http://completist.wordpress.com/2009/05 ... eck-razor/

Why do you consider the letter to be "very misleading?"

Thanks


If defacto control exists, then the people at UD aren't very smart.

They muddied up future razor products with their USA set. If you control something, you don't compete with it.


Plus, I am sure that the financial ties were to edgeman, and not razor. Read, the information is out there.



Perhaps the main purpose was not to make a nice prospect product, but rather, to send a blow to Topps products, namely Bowman Draft.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Top