WJCIII said:There are so many moronic statements in this thread that I'm not even sure how to respond.
I have yet to see even one.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
WJCIII said:There are so many moronic statements in this thread that I'm not even sure how to respond.
beefycheddar said:200lbhockeyplayer said:What would possibly make him a good choice? One thing would suffice.
He has as much credentials as Selig had, he owned a team.
hive17 said:Bud may have been/is a ******, but he has made everyone associated with the MLB extremely rich during his tenure.
hive17 said:For the love of the game, Bush would probably be pretty good. I know he LOVES the game and fancys himself enough of an athlete that he would probably empathize with the players.
So, for that reason and the fact that he has never really been that good at anything that requires a savy business sense, there is no way in hell the owners would EVER let it happen.
Bud may have been/is a ******, but he has made everyone associated with the MLB extremely rich during his tenure.
Rickzcards said:Anyone that would support GWB and have him put in charge of anything should have their head examined for traces of brains. If he were the commish he would ruin baseball and it would be in the state our nation is in. He was the worst president in history and would be likewise in baseball.
His heart would be in the right place, but he's a writer...nothing more. With virtually no first-hand business knowledge and experience, he is not someone that the owners could put a lot of faith into to make them money.jlecates said:Seriously, no more former owners as commissioners! If we're just throwing names out at this point - George Will would be an interesting candidate.
All true, but I must admit that I'm almost in favor of someone coming in from outside the world of MLB at this point. Though I'm not on the same side as Will politically I do consider him an intellectual and I applaud the fact that he doesn't shy away from pointing a finger at himself or those whom he typically supports. I suppose just personal preference for me at this point, and certainly the point about baseball's economic infrastructure is on point as it will be difficult for a non-owner to easily adapt in that way.200lbhockeyplayer said:His heart would be in the right place, but he's a writer...nothing more. With virtually no first-hand business knowledge and experience, he is not someone that the owners could put a lot of faith into to make them money.jlecates said:Seriously, no more former owners as commissioners! If we're just throwing names out at this point - George Will would be an interesting candidate.