Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
That's why he's a writer, not a gm.frzg said:Skorris CCBC said:yakacack said:That deal makes no sense for the Cardinals if they are giving up three others players aside from just Rasmus as moving bullpen guys for different bullpen guys doesn't address that need.
Not really, we had the worst lefties this year. Tallet had no place on this team, Miller was struggling. Walters wasn't even a decent mop-up man.
It doesn't matter, they got no where near enough value for him. Jason Churchill who runs one of the main Mariner prospect websites and is an ESPN writer advocated the M's to trade MICHAEL PINEDA for Rasmus. He said that is what it would take to get him and even Brandon League + Eric Bedard wasn't enough and we would have to add prospects. They got no where near his value.
SamHell said:Rasmus having his manager talk trash about him a few days before did not help his trade value.
Skorris CCBC said:frzg said:[quote="Skorris CCBC":391x7386]yakacack said:That deal makes no sense for the Cardinals if they are giving up three others players aside from just Rasmus as moving bullpen guys for different bullpen guys doesn't address that need.
Not really, we had the worst lefties this year. Tallet had no place on this team, Miller was struggling. Walters wasn't even a decent mop-up man.
It doesn't matter, they got no where near enough value for him. Jason Churchill who runs one of the main Mariner prospect websites and is an ESPN writer advocated the M's to trade MICHAEL PINEDA for Rasmus. He said that is what it would take to get him and even Brandon League + Eric Bedard wasn't enough and we would have to add prospects. They got no where near his value.
Adamsince1981 said:Skorris CCBC said:frzg said:[quote="Skorris CCBC":3va5wjjh]yakacack said:That deal makes no sense for the Cardinals if they are giving up three others players aside from just Rasmus as moving bullpen guys for different bullpen guys doesn't address that need.
Not really, we had the worst lefties this year. Tallet had no place on this team, Miller was struggling. Walters wasn't even a decent mop-up man.
It doesn't matter, they got no where near enough value for him. Jason Churchill who runs one of the main Mariner prospect websites and is an ESPN writer advocated the M's to trade MICHAEL PINEDA for Rasmus. He said that is what it would take to get him and even Brandon League + Eric Bedard wasn't enough and we would have to add prospects. They got no where near his value.
Of course it's no where near fair value. Just stating that Miller and Tallet had no place on this team.
It doesn't matter what a blogger thinks. Mozeliak's hand was forced. I'm upset with the return, I really wanted Thames, but whatever.
Skorris CCBC said:Adamsince1981 said:[quote="Skorris CCBC":1ppsuult]frzg said:[quote="Skorris CCBC":1ppsuult]yakacack said:That deal makes no sense for the Cardinals if they are giving up three others players aside from just Rasmus as moving bullpen guys for different bullpen guys doesn't address that need.
Not really, we had the worst lefties this year. Tallet had no place on this team, Miller was struggling. Walters wasn't even a decent mop-up man.
It doesn't matter, they got no where near enough value for him. Jason Churchill who runs one of the main Mariner prospect websites and is an ESPN writer advocated the M's to trade MICHAEL PINEDA for Rasmus. He said that is what it would take to get him and even Brandon League + Eric Bedard wasn't enough and we would have to add prospects. They got no where near his value.
Of course it's no where near fair value. Just stating that Miller and Tallet had no place on this team.
It doesn't matter what a blogger thinks. Mozeliak's hand was forced. I'm upset with the return, I really wanted Thames, but whatever.
braden said:For Cards fans, from a Jays fan:
If Dotel only faces righties, you'll love him.
You'll fall in love with Rzep's slider against lefties. It's wonderful. I still think he can start.
Patterson, you'll hate him. Hate. He'll tease you with a game or two where he flashes his enormous talent and he'll kill you with his complete lack of baseball IQ. Horrible fielding, the worst baserunning I've ever seen, and the complete inability to take a walk.
Rzep's the one longterm key to this. He could be a shutdown LOOGY, a shutdown set-up man, or, potentially in the NL Central, a #3 starter.
Adamsince1981 said:Skorris CCBC said:Adamsince1981 said:[quote="Skorris CCBC":133wastf]frzg said:[quote="Skorris CCBC":133wastf]yakacack said:That deal makes no sense for the Cardinals if they are giving up three others players aside from just Rasmus as moving bullpen guys for different bullpen guys doesn't address that need.
Not really, we had the worst lefties this year. Tallet had no place on this team, Miller was struggling. Walters wasn't even a decent mop-up man.
It doesn't matter, they got no where near enough value for him. Jason Churchill who runs one of the main Mariner prospect websites and is an ESPN writer advocated the M's to trade MICHAEL PINEDA for Rasmus. He said that is what it would take to get him and even Brandon League + Eric Bedard wasn't enough and we would have to add prospects. They got no where near his value.
Of course it's no where near fair value. Just stating that Miller and Tallet had no place on this team.
It doesn't matter what a blogger thinks. Mozeliak's hand was forced. I'm upset with the return, I really wanted Thames, but whatever.
I try to keep telling myself that Rzepczynski and Jackson are more important for 2011 than Rasmus. But, long term, I hate this trade and LaRussa.
Skorris CCBC said:Adamsince1981 said:[quote="Skorris CCBC":8d7fks4n]Adamsince1981 said:[quote="Skorris CCBC":8d7fks4n]frzg said:[quote="Skorris CCBC":8d7fks4n]yakacack said:That deal makes no sense for the Cardinals if they are giving up three others players aside from just Rasmus as moving bullpen guys for different bullpen guys doesn't address that need.
Not really, we had the worst lefties this year. Tallet had no place on this team, Miller was struggling. Walters wasn't even a decent mop-up man.
It doesn't matter, they got no where near enough value for him. Jason Churchill who runs one of the main Mariner prospect websites and is an ESPN writer advocated the M's to trade MICHAEL PINEDA for Rasmus. He said that is what it would take to get him and even Brandon League + Eric Bedard wasn't enough and we would have to add prospects. They got no where near his value.
Of course it's no where near fair value. Just stating that Miller and Tallet had no place on this team.
It doesn't matter what a blogger thinks. Mozeliak's hand was forced. I'm upset with the return, I really wanted Thames, but whatever.
I try to keep telling myself that Rzepczynski and Jackson are more important for 2011 than Rasmus. But, long term, I hate this trade and LaRussa.
ballerskrip said:I realize that many are HARD for Rasmus's upside....BUT
This year, in a Lineup with Pujols, Berkman, and Holliday -
.246
14 HR
40 Rbi
77 k's in 338 at bats
5 sb
Not really sure what I am missing. Along with questionable makeup issues, family issues, uncoachable (according to Cardinals coaches), etc.
He could turn out to be a stud, but he is 1300 at bats into his career. It's not like he is a rookie.
skrip
ballerskrip said:I realize that many are HARD for Rasmus's upside....BUT
This year, in a Lineup with Pujols, Berkman, and Holliday -
.246
14 HR
40 Rbi
77 k's in 338 at bats
5 sb
Not really sure what I am missing. Along with questionable makeup issues, family issues, uncoachable (according to Cardinals coaches), etc.
He could turn out to be a stud, but he is 1300 at bats into his career. It's not like he is a rookie.
skrip
ballerskrip said:I realize that many are HARD for Rasmus's upside....BUT
This year, in a Lineup with Pujols, Berkman, and Holliday -
.246
14 HR
40 Rbi
77 k's in 338 at bats
5 sb
Not really sure what I am missing. Along with questionable makeup issues, family issues, uncoachable (according to Cardinals coaches), etc.
He could turn out to be a stud, but he is 1300 at bats into his career. It's not like he is a rookie.
skrip
Adamsince1981 said:ballerskrip said:I realize that many are HARD for Rasmus's upside....BUT
This year, in a Lineup with Pujols, Berkman, and Holliday -
.246
14 HR
40 Rbi
77 k's in 338 at bats
5 sb
Not really sure what I am missing. Along with questionable makeup issues, family issues, uncoachable (according to Cardinals coaches), etc.
He could turn out to be a stud, but he is 1300 at bats into his career. It's not like he is a rookie.
skrip
He just got traded to a much tougher division, but I think he'll mature and play better away from LaRussa.
braden said:ballerskrip said:I realize that many are HARD for Rasmus's upside....BUT
This year, in a Lineup with Pujols, Berkman, and Holliday -
.246
14 HR
40 Rbi
77 k's in 338 at bats
5 sb
Not really sure what I am missing. Along with questionable makeup issues, family issues, uncoachable (according to Cardinals coaches), etc.
He could turn out to be a stud, but he is 1300 at bats into his career. It's not like he is a rookie.
skrip
Oh, totally. But when the cost is three spare parts and two B level prospects (counting Scrabble as a prospect), I'll take that shot any day.