- Thread starter
- #1
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
MallCopKJ said:They dropped $88 million and have spent $423.5 million. Dont try to go a 1 year basis, because the guys who were dropped for salary were gone anyways, and the guys they signed are now under contract for multiple year.
MallCopKJ said:Well, to me it doesnt make sense to try to make the argument that their "dropping money" or "cutting salary" when their spending close to and likely over half a billion dollars in the end. Yes, for next year they might have less in salary for the team but in the longrun they have spent multiple times over.
MallCopKJ said:They dropped $88 million and have spent $423.5 million. Dont try to go a 1 year basis, because the guys who were dropped for salary were gone anyways, and the guys they signed are now under contract for multiple years.
Casey2884 said:Team payrolls are looked at on a YEARLY basis... period. No one refers to the total cumulative sum of all contracted players' contracts when they are referring to a team's payroll, because the number would be meaningless. Every player is under contract for a different number of years, so using the total liable contract money for each player's full-term contract is not an interpretable number. Therefore, a reference interval of 1-year is used, so one can compare multiple teams ... as someone above said, it is comparing apples to oranges.
And for the record, the Yankees' 2009 payroll will be UNDER $200M this year, and is actually on the way down. One could even argue that they are ADDRESSING (and not worsening) "the problem" that so many pro-salary-cappers believe there is in the sport.
bigpapiMA32 said:MallCopKJ said:Well, to me it doesnt make sense to try to make the argument that their "dropping money" or "cutting salary" when their spending close to and likely over half a billion dollars in the end. Yes, for next year they might have less in salary for the team but in the longrun they have spent multiple times over.
It just means they won't be signing many players in the next couple years. Their next big contract drop is Jeter who has a good 2-4 seasons left in him. So the Yankees better hope it works out with the big three they've signed because they won't exactly have much money to spend in the future.
ostrander111 said:They got rid of a big salary in Giambi.....
Tomlinson21RB said:And don't forget all the money theyre taking from the new york tax payers to build their new stadium. It allows them to go out an agree to almost a half billion dollars in total contracts because new yorks tax revenue will pay for part of their stadium. Who cares about schools, roads, and state provided services when tax payers can buy a stadium for a team that throws money around like that.
Tomlinson21RB said:And don't forget all the money theyre taking from the new york tax payers to build their new stadium. It allows them to go out an agree to almost a half billion dollars in total contracts because new yorks tax revenue will pay for part of their stadium. Who cares about schools, roads, and state provided services when tax payers can buy a stadium for a team that throws money around like that.
jdacunha said:Tomlinson21RB said:And don't forget all the money theyre taking from the new york tax payers to build their new stadium. It allows them to go out an agree to almost a half billion dollars in total contracts because new yorks tax revenue will pay for part of their stadium. Who cares about schools, roads, and state provided services when tax payers can buy a stadium for a team that throws money around like that.
There are plenty of teams that screw cities w/the cost of building stadium. Let's not act like the Yankees are the only team. It's a circle of money!
A lot of the $$ being raised it being raised by issuing municipal bonds backed by the revenue Yankees Stadium will bring in.
MallCopKJ said:I believe the Yankees salary for 09 will be somewhere around $209 million not UNDER $200 million. Its so laughable that were actually trying to make $200 million NOT seem like an outrageous amount of money.
MallCopKJ said:Alright, so Yankees fans can make the case that the payrole will be down in 2009. Thats fine, and given the evidence I will agree to that. At the same time, I will say that the team having close to $1 Billion dollars tied up in contracts (and you cant tell me its a ridiculous point to make unless you figure their dropping guys and resigning them on a year to year basis because they will be paid the money the contract states) is way over the top. This is especially true when you hear that their asking the city of New York for $300 million. As I sai earlier, the Yankees total team salary for 2009 is $76million+ more than the Red Sox. Just the difference separating the 2 teams (which everyone claims to be so close) is almost double the total team salary of the Rays.