Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Has David Ortiz gone from Lovable to huge d-bag?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

bmp1971

Active member
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
5,712
Reaction score
1
Location
New Hampshire
Undetectable steeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeroids!

Papi hit .688 in the World Series and won the MVP because the guy is a beast and you don't want to admit it.

Papi's enemies will whine about whether or not he used PEDs back in 2004 prob as long as they remember Big Papi, but however much any PEDs helped him earlier on in his career, he's clearly proven himself as a BOSS on the field ever since.

Most fans outside of Boston can't handle Papi because all he does is beat your team.
 

elmalo

New member
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
5,216
Reaction score
0
Papi hit .688 in the World Series and won the MVP because the guy is a beast and you don't want to admit it.

Papi's enemies will whine about whether or not he used PEDs back in 2004 prob as long as they remember Big Papi, but however much any PEDs helped him earlier on in his career, he's clearly proven himself as a BOSS on the field ever since.

Most fans outside of Boston can't handle Papi because all he does is beat your team.
That is assuming that he stopped taking whatever it was that he was taking.
 

jcmint

Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
5,677
Reaction score
2
Anabolic steroids were always against the law and certainly not meant for athlete consumption but for race horses.
i never had any respect for him or manny for that fact. If you pitched even a tad inside they would give a state or over exaggerate every pitch slightly inside and heavens forbid they got brushed. The flip and pose maybe bonds look silly and that was hard to do and bonds hit 70

ortiz will never sniff the hall of fame
voters will never overlook the steroids legal by baseball or not no baseball rules supercede state or federal laws.
 

jcmint

Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
5,677
Reaction score
2
Just like bonds mcgwire and ire and sosas had nothing to do with their success. Lol someone is drinking the coolaid


Do you think Ortiz hitting .688 in the 2013 World Series (against outstanding pitching) and his subsequent MVP award is attributed to steroids?

The guy is a beast. Accept it. Steroids has nothing to do with it.
 

hive17

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
21,426
Reaction score
24
I guess I always gave Papi a pass because he was standing nect to Manny. EVERYONE looks like a nice guy standing next to that ******.

But my biggest problem was that April/May/June were filled with stories about how Carlos Gomez is some sort of problem, but no one said **** about Ortiz. They both may have pimped their shots (Papi definately), but GoGo would make it around the basepath at 2X the speed, documented. But because Papi is "untouchable" and GoGo stands up to people when they jaw at him, GoGo is the ******* and Papi just has "fun with it". ********...
 

elmalo

New member
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
5,216
Reaction score
0
Anabolic steroids were always against the law and certainly not meant for athlete consumption but for race horses.
i never had any respect for him or manny for that fact. If you pitched even a tad inside they would give a state or over exaggerate every pitch slightly inside and heavens forbid they got brushed. The flip and pose maybe bonds look silly and that was hard to do and bonds hit 70

ortiz will never sniff the hall of fame
voters will never overlook the steroids legal by baseball or not no baseball rules supercede state or federal laws.
Actually, no, they were designed for humans and were not illegal until 1990 when they were classified as a controlled substance.
 

bmp1971

Active member
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
5,712
Reaction score
1
Location
New Hampshire
I guess I always gave Papi a pass because he was standing nect to Manny. EVERYONE looks like a nice guy standing next to that ******.

But my biggest problem was that April/May/June were filled with stories about how Carlos Gomez is some sort of problem, but no one said **** about Ortiz. They both may have pimped their shots (Papi definately), but GoGo would make it around the basepath at 2X the speed, documented. But because Papi is "untouchable" and GoGo stands up to people when they jaw at him, GoGo is the ******* and Papi just has "fun with it". ********...

Because Gomez hit a "no-doubter" that didn't leave the park. You don't stare at your double.
 

hive17

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
21,426
Reaction score
24
Because Gomez hit a "no-doubter" that didn't leave the park. You don't stare at your double.

He thought it would be gone, then thought it would be caught, then made a positive play out of it.

So, you're fine with your double-standard. Good to know. Papi would have been thrown out at 1st base in that same situation.
 

bmp1971

Active member
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
5,712
Reaction score
1
Location
New Hampshire
He thought it would be gone, then thought it would be caught, then made a positive play out of it.

So, you're fine with your double-standard. Good to know. Papi would have been thrown out at 1st base in that same situation.

"Would have been" never was. That is the key difference, hive. Papi won the game with that swing. Gomez only started a fight. Therefore, it's not a double-standard when the one results in what it did for Gomez, and I like Gomez, and the other wins the game because it was a bomb.

As I mentioned earlier, Papi didn't show-boat it on that bat toss, he was just pumped, and far less pumped than I've seem Archer at times when he displays his own flamboyance and stares people (*Nava*) down after he strikes them out. That's bush and prob what instigated Papi to be more emotional.
 

hive17

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
21,426
Reaction score
24
"Would have been" never was. That is the key difference, hive. Papi won the game with that swing. Gomez only started a fight. Therefore, it's not a double-standard when the one results in what it did for Gomez, and I like Gomez, and the other wins the game because it was a bomb.

As I mentioned earlier, Papi didn't show-boat it on that bat toss, he was just pumped, and far less pumped than I've seem Archer at times when he displays his own flamboyance and stares people (*Nava*) down after he strikes them out. That's bush and prob what instigated Papi to be more emotional.

If you want to pretend this is just about 1 issue with Ortiz and 1 issue with Gomez, have your willful ignorance.

Meanwhile, I patiently await your defense of Gomez during the McCann altercation...
 

bmp1971

Active member
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
5,712
Reaction score
1
Location
New Hampshire
If you want to pretend this is just about 1 issue with Ortiz and 1 issue with Gomez, have your willful ignorance.

Meanwhile, I patiently await your defense of Gomez during the McCann altercation...

As usual, it was a payback to the Braves and Maholm for apparently intentionally hitting him in June for no fault of his own. Either way, he apologized for going over the top. I don't need to defend anything there. I'm not defending Gomez, you are, or, were.
 

hive17

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
21,426
Reaction score
24
As usual, it was a payback to the Braves and Maholm for apparently intentionally hitting him in June for no fault of his own. Either way, he apologized for going over the top. I don't need to defend anything there. I'm not defending Gomez, you are, or, were.

I'm not defending Gomez. I'm pointing out that when Gomez "pimps" a homerun, it doesn't get played off, even though he hustles afterward.

You prefer Papi slowly dragging himself around the bases after a homerun, calling it emotion. I prefer hustle. The media has been quiet for years when Papi does it, but they couldn't wait to jump on Gomez for "emotion" or whatever. Hypocrites, one and all.
 

bmp1971

Active member
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
5,712
Reaction score
1
Location
New Hampshire
I'm not defending Gomez. I'm pointing out that when Gomez "pimps" a homerun, it doesn't get played off, even though he hustles afterward.

You prefer Papi slowly dragging himself around the bases after a homerun, calling it emotion. I prefer hustle. The media has been quiet for years when Papi does it, but they couldn't wait to jump on Gomez for "emotion" or whatever. Hypocrites, one and all.


I think there is a small difference in their actions relating to the situations mentioned. That's all. If you don't agree, I respect that and understand why you'd think that.

FTR: I'm not in favor of Papi being a ****** pepper with that slow trot, but the man just ain't built for speed. In a full sprint, the guy might only go twice as fast! :)

Anyway, emotion gets the better of these guys. Hating on any of these guys just isn't called for. Some go over the top and admit it, and some, like Papi, like to push things a bit further than most others prob would. Why? Prob tied into Price hitting him, or people talking s--t about him.

I think Archer talking s--t is more laughable than what Papi did-- which ultimately won the game for Boston.
 

vwnut13

Active member
Joined
Apr 19, 2009
Messages
8,004
Reaction score
0
Location
Vermont
I guess I always gave Papi a pass because he was standing nect to Manny. EVERYONE looks like a nice guy standing next to that ******.

But my biggest problem was that April/May/June were filled with stories about how Carlos Gomez is some sort of problem, but no one said **** about Ortiz. They both may have pimped their shots (Papi definately), but GoGo would make it around the basepath at 2X the speed, documented. But because Papi is "untouchable" and GoGo stands up to people when they jaw at him, GoGo is the ******* and Papi just has "fun with it". ********...


Oh, trust me, I was going to make a post about Ortiz in those threads, but figured I would be attacked if I mentioned the lovable, huggable, teddy bear.
 

jcmint

Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
5,677
Reaction score
2
Always iilegal meaning during Ortiz playing years
winnyv premo deca cop etc were all made for race horses and came from Mexico

Actually, no, they were designed for humans and were not illegal until 1990 when they were classified as a controlled substance.
 

elmalo

New member
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
5,216
Reaction score
0
Always iilegal meaning during Ortiz playing years
winnyv premo deca cop etc were all made for race horses and came from Mexico
The history of anabolic steroids can be traced back to as early as 1930's, before the term steroid was even used. In the 1930's, a team of scientists was able to create a synthetic form of testosterone (a male hormone) to help treat men who were unable to produce enough of the hormone for normal growth, development, and sexual functioning. Later, during World War II it was found that this artificial form of testosterone could be used to help malnourished soldiers gain weight and improve performance. After the war, athletes began to use steroids to enhance their performance in competitions. In the 1956 Olympics, Soviet athletes, especially wrestlers, performed at exceptionally high levels. After learning that those athletes were using testosterone, an American physician (Dr. Zeigler) created a more selective form of what we know as anabolic steroids.
History and Background of Winstrol

Winstrol was first invented in 1959. Soon after that, the UK based Winthrop Laboratories created a prescription medicine from it. Later, in 1961, Winthrop’s patent was bought by the US based Sterling that started manufacturing and selling the drug in the American markets.
In the beginning, Winstrol was used for a variety of medical reasons. But later, by the 1970s, the FDA had restricted its use to only promoting growth and treating osteoporosis. In the 1980s, there was a termination of the manufacture of anabolic steroids in the American market. But Winstrol was among those steroids which not only survived, but thrived in the 1980s and 1990s. During this period, its use was reinforced as a cure for anemia – as it had the power to boost red blood cell count, and was used as a treatment for facial swelling or angioedema
Primobolan’s properties and details were first released and published in 1960[1]. Squibb released the injectable format of Primobolan (Methenolone Enanthate) first in 1962 followed by the release of the oral variant of Primo (Methenolone Acetate) into the American market in the same year[2]. It was at the time marketed under the brand name Nibal Depot (for the injectable) and Nibal for the oral variant dosed at 20mg per tablet. Very shortly afterwards, the rights for manufacture of the compound were sold in West Germany to Schering. Following this sale of rights, Nibal was removed from the US market and instead, Schering marketed the compound under the new trade name Primobolan (for both variants). It then became the quintessential anabolic steroid manufactured by Schering, who then marketed the compound as an internationally exclusive drug, and would never return to the American Market. An interesting point to note is that even though Primobolan was never marketed in the United States after Schering had bought the rights to it, it is still listed as an FDA approved drug. This had enabled American doctors to be able to import it on special order.
The first publication describing the details of Deca-Durabolin was in 1960[1] and was developed by Organon, and in 1962 it was marketed and released as a prescription drug under the brand name Deca Durabolin. The truth is that Nandrolone had actually been synthesized and created in 1957, and its most common variant was the Phenylpropionate variant (Nandrolone Phenylpropionate). Unfortunately although Nandrolone Phenylpropionate became quite popular, its nature as a short estered compound (Phenylpropionate) required an every-other-day injection which for some users was an inconvenience. Nandrolone Decanoate, released under the trade name Deca Durabolin, utilized a much longer (10 carbon long) ester, which provided the base compound (Nandrolone) with a much longer half-life and the convenience of infrequent injections in comparison to the Phenylpropionate variant before it. It was soon after its release that Deca became very popular due to its favorable properties and ease of administration, leading it to become the second most popular and most widely used anabolic steroid ever in existence, second only to Dianabol.
Its first introduction to the market saw many applications for medical use, such as: the construction of lean mass following periods of atrophy, osteoporosis, advanced breast cancer, weight loss as a product of disease, frailty, geriatric conditions, burns, trauma recovery, ulcers, anemia, and child growth and development retardation. Upon initial release, standard concentrations were found as 50mg/ml but soon after were updated to 100mg/ml concentrations, and later on a 200mg/ml concentration product. As with most anabolic steroids during this period, Deca Durabolin in the 1970s saw its list of medical application cut back and narrowed by the FDA. Modern medical application of Deca-Durabolin has fallen short even further, narrowing the approved applications down to treating anemic patients, HIV/AIDS pateints, and any others with muscle wasting conditions. It has seemed to be the very few anabolic steroids that have survived the period of anabolic steroid manufacturing cessation in the early 1990s. Many Western pharmaceutical companies during this time halted and discontinued production of various anabolic steroids (such as Dianabol, for example), which cannot be found today (pharmaceutical grade products) in North America or the Western world as a result. Some pharmaceutical corporations had resumed production after a brief period of cessation (such is the case with Anavar), but Deca-Durabolin is one anabolic steroid that has not suffered pharmaceutical discontinuation whether it be temporary or permanent. Pharmaceutical grade Deca-Durabolin is still widely available in the United States, and plenty of other generic pharmaceutical brands are manufactured in other countries across the w
 
Last edited:

Members online

Top