- Thread starter
- #1
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Listened to it already. It was pretty awesome seeing as I dislike both.
I understand what he was trying to do, and I do agree with Stern that it was poor journalism to ask the question. What answer does he expect to get when he asks "was it rigged." He could have asked what his reaction was to everyone assuming it was rigged and I'm sure it wouldn't have had so much animosity.
I thought that Rome asked the question quite well. He tried to avoid being accusatory, even going as far as saying that he didn't believe it was rigged.
Stern went on later in the interview attacking Rome's career. Rome acted rational throughout the interview, while Stern was far from it. "Why don't you hang up on me?"
Stern should have reacted better, and it's surprising knowing how calculated he always is with his responses. He's definitely in legacy mode now that he's reaching the end of his career, and is probably fed up because everyone knows he is ruining the league.
Could there be two more polarizing people having that discussion? Can't believe the commissioner would stoop to that level. The easy answer for Stern would have been "no". End of discussion.
What level? Showing Rome that by asking his question there was no 'good' way for Stern to answer it? Nothing wrong with using the old "have you stopped beating your wife?" trick.